Kensington, Ex parle

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date10 April 1813
Date10 April 1813
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 35 E.R. 249

HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY

Kensington, Ex parle

2 V. & B. 80. EX PARTE KENSINGTON 249 Kensington, Ex park. Aprilxl0, 1813, Equitable Mortgage by Deposit of Deeds extended beyond the original Purpose, to Advances after an Alteration of the Firrn, by Implication or Parol. Stock in the Public Funds in the Names of a Bankrupt and others on Trust : the Bankrupt being one of the Gestuis q_ue Trust, his equitable Interest not within the Statute 21 Jam. 1, o. 19, s. 11 ; and therefore, not being capable of actual Transfer, passed by Assignment. Duncan Hunter on the 19th of March 1805, deposited with the Petitioners, his Bankers, several Deeds ; and signed the following Memorandum, addressed to Messrs. Moffatt, Kensington, and Styan, Bankers, [80] London. " London, 19th " March 1805. Gentlemen, Herewith I beg leave to deposit in your House the " Deeds and Policy of Assurance upon the following Leasehold Property ; " (describing it) " to remain with you as a collateral Security for the Balance of any Sum or " Sums of Money which you may at any Time advance for my Account, and which I hereby oblige myself Heirs or Executors to assign in a legal Manner whenever " required so to do." On the 25th of September 1805, Hunter executed a Bond to the same Persons in the Penalty of £40,000, with Condition for Payment to them, and in case of any Alteration taking place in their Firm, then to the Persons composing a new Firm, if comprising two of the original Members, of all Sums thereafter in any Manner lent unto or advanced on Account of said Duncan Hunter by the Petitioners. In December following Moffatt retired from the Partnership. On the 6th of August 1807, Hunter, requiring additional Advances, deposited with the Petitioners the Title Deeds of an Estate, called Cromwell Park ; and on the 7th of August signed the following Memorandum. " Messrs. Kensington and Co. Gentlemen, I hereby " deposit in your Hands the Title Deeds which I hold of Cromicell Park, as a collateral " Security for any Cash Transactions which I have had or may have with your House, " and which I agree to assign whenever I am required so to do. London. 7 Aug. " 1807." In March 1809, Hunter, wanting farther Advances, proposed a Deposit of other Deeds of Premises held under the Drapers' Company by Lease at a Rent of £400 a Year, and agreed to assign to the Petitioners his Interest in £3000 3 per cent. Consolidated Bank Annuities, in-[81]-vested in the Names of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Jones v Jones
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 30 May 1846
    ...proportion of the capital, as well as the interest, with reference to the 'benefit derived by the tenant for life, is to be paid by him " (2 V. & B. 79). The decree, as drawn up, directed an inquiry, " how much of the said fine, fees and expenses, with reference to the interest of the Plain......
  • Devitt v Kearney
    • Ireland
    • Court of Chancery (Ireland)
    • 10 March 1883
    ...C. DEVITT and KEARNEY. Ex parte Langston 17 Ves. 227. Ex parte KensingtonENR 2 V. & B. 79. Ex parte NettleshipUNK 2 Mont. D. & De G. 124. M'Neillie v. ActonENR 4 De G. M. & G. 744. Brassey v. ChalmersENR 16 Beav. 231. Thompson v. Todd 15 Ir. Ch. R. 337. In re Butterfield 1 De Gex, 319. Ex p......
  • North West Trust Co. v. West, (1989) 101 A.R. 257 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 19 October 1989
    ...the debtor intended to charge the lands. Cases Noticed: Shaw v. Foster (1872), L.R. 5 H.L. 321, dist. [para. 7]. Ex Parte Kensington (1813), 35 E.R. 249, dist. [para. Royal Bank of Canada v. Mesa Estates, [1986] 2 W.W.R. 641 (B.C.C.A.), not folld. [para. 7]. Fialkowski v. Fialkowski & T......
  • White v White
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Chancery
    • 1 January 1817
    ...to his enjoyment ; riot, as formerly, a fixed sum of one third ; nor obliging him merely to keep down the interest. Allan v. Backhouse, 2 Ves. & Bea. 79. So, the old rule, imposing 1 VEB. Hill. SUPP. 429. DICKKNSON V. LOCKYER, 4 VES. JUN. 36 upon the tenant for life a gross sum, as his shar......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT