Kensit v Great Eastern Railway Company
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1882 |
| Year | 1882 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Richard Eaton Pearson v Lillie Eileen Julia Foster
...is no natural right to water in an artificial watercourse" (Halsbury's Laws of England, volume 87, at paragraph 999). Thus, in Kensit v Great Eastern Railway Co (1884) 27 Ch D 122, Cotton LJ said (at 133–134): "It seems to me to be a contradiction in terms to say that any natural rights can......
-
Sampson v Hoddinott
...Roberts v. Richards, 1881, 50 L. J. Ch. 302; 51 L. J. Ch. 944. Distinguished, Kensit v. Great Eastern Railway, 1883-84, 23 Ch. D. 566; 27 Ch. D. 122. Macartney v. Londonderry and Lough Swilly Railway, [1904] A. C. 311. Principle applied, Sharp v. Wilson, 1905, 93 L. T. 155. sampson v. hoddi......
-
William Northam against Richard Hurley
...Northam against Richard Hurley S. C. 22 L. J. Q. B. 183; 17 Jur. 672. See Kensit v. Great Eastern Railway, 1883-84, 23 Ch. D. 566; 27 Ch. D. 122. [665] william northam agaiiist kichakd hurley. Saturday, February 5th, 1853. Where A., being owner of land through which a stream runs down to th......
-
Elmhirst v Spencer
...v. Cambridge Consumers Gas Company, 1868, L. R. 4 Ch. 86; Kensit v. Great Eastern Railway Company, 1883-84, 23 Ch. D. 573; 27 Ch. D. 122. [45] elmhirst v. spencer. Dec. 5, 6, 1849. [Distinguished, Goldsmul v. Tunbridge Wells Improvement Commissioners, 1866, L. E. 1 Ch. 355. See Attorney-Gen......
Request a trial to view additional results