Kershaw v Whelan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date12 October 1995
Date12 October 1995
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
15 cases
  • Domhnall Mac A'Bhaird v Commissioners of Public Works in Ireland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 6 Febrero 2015
    ...plc v. DCC plc [2005] 1 I.R. 59 (at p. 68), Fennelly J. cited with approval the following dictum of Ebsworth J. in Kershaw v. Whelan [1996] 1 W.L.R. 358 (at p. 370): "Waiver is not lightly to be inferred; although privilege is an aspect of the law of evidence and not of constitutional right......
  • Hansfield Developments and Others v Irish Asphalt Ltd and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 21 Septiembre 2009
    ...DCC [2005] 1 IR 59 applied; Paragon Finance v Freshfields [1999] I WLR 1183, Lyell v Kennedy (No 3) (1884) 27 ChD and Kershaw v. Whelan [1996] 1 WLR 358 followed; Spotless Group Ltd v Premier Building & Consulting Group Pty Ltd (2006) 16 VR 1 approved; Smurfit Paribas Bank Ltd v AAB Export......
  • Dse (Holdings) Pty Ltd v Intertan Inc.
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Fyffes Plc v D.C.C Plc
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 27 Enero 2005
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Generalised Rules of Fairness in Evidence Law
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 63-1, January 2000
    • 1 Enero 2000
    ...in a position to dispute quantum and mitigation ofloss. Put another way, Freshfields argued that this item of Paragon’s claim resulted28 [1996] 1 WLR 358 at 370 (QBD).29 [1996] PNLR 578 at 589D-E (Ch. D).30 [1993] 1 All ER 724 (CA).31 Hayes vDowding [1996] PNLR at 594A.32 Lillicrap vNalder ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT