Kettlewell v Watson
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Year | 1881 |
Date | 1881 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Chu et al. v. Chen et al., (2004) 197 B.C.A.C. 201 (CA)
...v. Goodman, [1969] S.C.R. 923, consd. [para. 42]. Rice v. Rice, 2 Drewry 73; 61 E.R. 646, refd to. [para. 50]. Kettlewell v. Watson (1884), 26 Ch.D. 501, refd to. [para. 50]. Mackreth v. Symmons (1808), 15 Ves. Jun 329; 33 E.R. 778, refd to. [para. 50]. Hearn v. Botelers (1604), Cary 25; 21......
-
Hall v. Hall, 2015 BCCA 96
...v. Edwards (1876), 2 Ch. D. 499; 45 L.J. Ch. 554, refd to. [para. 28]. Kettlewell v. Watson (1882), 21 Ch. D. 685; 54 L.J. Ch. 281, affd. 26 Ch. D. 501; 53 L.J. Ch. 717, refd to. [para. Allen v. Inland Revenue Commrs., [1914] 2 K.B. 327; 83 L.J.K.B. 649, refd to. [para. 28]. Garland v. Cons......
-
George Rice, Lydia Rice and William Nail and Hannah, his Wife, v Michael Rice, Joseph Ede and Stephen Knight
...9 Ch. D. 142: Ortigosa v. Brown, 1878, 47 L. J. Ch. 174; Cave v. Cave, 1880, 15 Ch. D. 648; Kettlewell v. Watson, 1882-84, 21 Ch. D. 712; 26 Ch. D. 501; Bickerton v. Walter, 1885, 31 Ch. D. 159; In re Vernon, Ewens & Company, 1886, 33 Ch. D. 408; Union Bank of London v. Kent, 1888, 39 Ch. D......
-
Barclays Bank Plc v Estates and Commercial Ltd ((in Liquidation)) and Another
...was not supported by the authority there cited, Davies v ThomasELR ([1900] 2 Ch 462) and was inconsistent with Kettlewood v WatsonELR ((1884) 26 Ch D 501). Thus, the question was whether there was anything in the transaction which would lead to the exclusion of the lien. All that the plaint......
Request a trial to view additional results