Kevin Glancy v HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 2012 SCCR 52,2001 SCCR 385 |
| Date | 2001 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Appeal Against Conviction By Robert Urquhart Against Her Majesty's Advocate
...on a balance of probabilities. The circumstances of the present case could be distinguished from those in the cases of Glancy v HMA 2012 SCCR 52 and McMurdo v HMA 2015 HCJAC 37, where the court had confirmed that a legal burden of proof was imposed in relation to statutory defences to, on t......
-
Derek Adam V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...fundamental rights - Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions [2004] UKHL 43; [2005] 1 AC 264; Glancy v HM Advocate [2011] HCJAC 104; 2012 SCCR 52. [11] It was submitted that it would be disproportionate and unfair to criminalise all owners of dogs which became dangerously out of control......
-
Craig Mcleod Mcmurdo V Her Majesty's Advocate
...out the defence placed only an “evidential” burden on an accused and not a “legal” or “persuasive” burden (see Glancy v HM Advocate 2012 SCCR 52, Henvey v HM Advocate 2005 SCCR 282, following R v Lambert [2002] 2 AC 545). [8] The advocate depute maintained that the sub-section imposed a leg......
-
Appeal By Nicholas Rodgers Against Her Majesty’s Advocate
...reference to the standard being lower than that of beyond reasonable doubt, its meaning could not be improved (Glancy v HM Advocate 2012 SCCR 52 and Robertson v HM Advocate 2012 SCCR 450). The mathematical approach was “pseudo mathematical” and thus in error (Re A (Children) (Care Proceedin......
Request a trial to view additional results