Khan v Royal Air Force Summary Appeal Court
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 07 October 2004 |
| Neutral Citation | [2004] EWHC 2230 (Admin) |
| Date | 07 October 2004 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
Queen's Bench Divisional Court
Before Lord Justice Rix and Mr Justice Forbes
Mohisin
and
Royal Air Force Summary Appeal Court
Armed forces - volunteer - no interference with freedom of conscience or religion without expression of objection
Conscience not demonstrated
A volunteer could not claim that his freedom of conscience or religion had been interfered with by the state unless he could say that he had made it clear in some appropriate and suitably formal way that he was no longer a volunteer.
The Queen's Bench Divisional Court so held when dismissing the appeal of Mohisin Khan from the decision of the RAF Summary Appeal Court to uphold his conviction and sentence of seven days loss...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
Hardtman and Others v Bermuda Regiment
...The following cases were referred to in the judgment: Bayatyan v Armenia ECHR 253/03 Khan v Royal Air Force Summary Appeal CourtUNK [2004] EWHC 2230 (Admin) R (Limbuela) v Home SecretaryELR [2006] 1 AC 414 Abstract: Constitutional rights - Forced labour - Conscientious objector - Military s......
-
Neil Christopher Gunn v Service Prosecuting Authority
...species of delegated or subordinate legislation. We agree with the observation of Rix LJ in Khan v Royal Air Force Summary Appeal Court [2004] EWHC 2230 (Admin), at [53], that the QR “…plainly have the status of law, being a form of delegated legislation…” — while recognising that the conte......
-
Hardtman and Others v Bermuda Regiment
...R (Williamson) v Secretary of State for Education and EmploymentELR [2003] QB 13002 Khan v Royal Air Force Summary Appeal CourtUNK [2004] EWHC 2230 (Admin)2 Labita v Italy [2000] ECHR 26772/952 Ireland v UK [1978] ECHR 5310/712 Kudla v Poland [2000] ECHR 30210/962 Yankov v Bulgaria [2003] E......
1 books & journal articles
-
Court Martials, Lay Membership and the Validity of Their Constitution: Gunn v Service Prosecuting Authority [2019] EWCA Crim 1470
...Queen’s Regulations forthe RAF. In the earlier case of Khan v Royal Air Force Summary Appeal Court [2004] EWHC 2230(Admin), in what was recognised as being a context ‘far removed from that of the present case’, Rix LJstated that the Regulations ‘plainly have the status of law, being a form ......