King v Corke
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1875 |
Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Bata Shoe Company Guyana, Ltd et Al v Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Attorney General Diamond Liquors Ltd et Al v The Commissioner of Inland Revenue and Attorney General
...could not be authority for the collection of taxes as from the date of the Speech or otherwise. See Bowles v. Bank of England [1913] 1 Ch. D. 57. Indeed, those budgetary proposals were implemented by the Insurance Act, 1970, (No. 25 of 1970) which was passed by the National Assembly on 2nd ......
-
Bahamas Oil Refining Company v Attorney General of The Bahamas et Al
...all costs incurred up to date as well as any costs thrown away by reason of the amendment: Jacobs v. Schmalz 62 LT F. 122; King v. Corke, 1 ChD. 57; Bowdens' Patents-Syndicate. Ltd. v. Herbert Smith & Co. [1904] 2 Ch 86. 134 counsel urged that the amendment ought not to be granted but if th......
-
Dickinson and Brown v Fisher's Executors
...loan, the respondent is entitled to recover the amount claimed. See Underhill on Partnership, p. 85. Garner v. 1916 AD p380 Murray (1904, 1 Ch.D., 57), Nowell v Nowell (L.R. 7 Eq. Ca. 538). Lindley on Partnership (6th ed., pp. 383, 371, and 600). The fact that money is repayable out of a pa......
-
Fruend v Edgecombe et Al
... ... In support of this assertion, counsel relied on the cases of King v. Corke [1875] 1 Ch.D.57 and Bowden's Patents Syndicate Ltd. v. Herbert Smith & Co. [1904] 2 Ch.86 ... THE PLAINTIFF'S SUBMISSIONS ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results