Kirkham v Boughey

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1957
Year1957
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
32 cases
  • Wong Kong v Yee Hup Tranport Company and Others
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1966
  • Teng Ching Sin and Another v Leong Kwong Sun
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 21 February 1994
    ... ... In coming to this conclusion the learned judicial commissioner relied on certain parts of the judgment of Diplock J in Kirkham v Boughey ... There, the husband and wife were injured in a motor accident caused by the negligence of the defendant. The husband sustained minor ... ...
  • McNeill v Johnstone
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ...Behrens v. Bertram Mills Circus Ltd.F8[1957] 2 W.L.R. 404; [1957] 1 All E.R. 583 explained. Kirkham v. Boughey [1957] 3 W.L.R. 626; [1957] 3 All E.R. 153 On May 30, 1957, a car driven by the plaintiff, Royce Houston McNeill, a lieutenant in the United States Air Force, in which his wife, El......
  • Lai Chi Kay and Others v Lee Kuo Shin
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 February 1981
    ...a case of the daughter herself suffering a loss and not one of her incurring expense on her father`s behalf at all.In Kirkham v Boughey [1958] 2 QB 338, the plaintiffs, husband and wife, sustained injuries as a result of a motor accident on 10 September 1955 caused by the negligence of the ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • RECOVERING THE COST OF VISITING AN INJURED PLAINTIFF
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1993, December 1993
    • 1 December 1993
    ...which K S Rajah JC relied was the decision of Diplock J in Kirkham v Boughey.58 Of this decision, his Honour said: “In Kirkham v Boughey[1958] 2 QB 338, Diplock J considered the objection taken to visits to the wife as an item of special damages on the ground that visits to the wife are not......