Konamaneni v Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date2002
Date2002
Year2002
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
128 cases
  • 889457 Alberta Inc. v Katanga Mining Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 5 Noviembre 2008
    ...is governed by the law of the DRC. The decision of Lawrence Collins J in Konomaneni v. Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Limited [2002] 1 WLR 1269 lends some support to the suggestion that the courts of the place of incorporation of the company would ordinarily be the most appropriate f......
  • KMG International NV v Melanie Anne Chen Chipper Management Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 9 Mayo 2018
    ...of the companies is concerned, counsel for the defendants relied on the decision of Lawrence Collins J in Konamaneni And Others v Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd [2002] 1 W.L.R. 1269 in support of the submission that where issues of internal management are concerned, the place of i......
  • BAS Capital Funding Corporation and Others v Medfinco Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 25 Julio 2003
    ...appropriate forum". It is not necessary for there to be an identity of issues or parties in the other proceedings: Konamaneni v Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd [2001] 1 WLR 1269. 108 The defendants say that there is a very substantial overlap between the issues in the various Malte......
  • Cuccolini S.R.L v Elcan Industries Inc.
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 8 Octubre 2013
    ...of the duty of full disclosure depend on the context. The principles were summarised by Lawrence Collins J in Konamaneni v Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 1269 at [180–181]: "On an application without notice the duty of the applicant is to make a full and fair disclos......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • LexisNexis Q&A ' Derivative Claims
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 10 Abril 2023
    ...circumstances) to determine derivative claims in respect of foreign companies (Konamaneni v Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd [2002] 1 W.L.R. 1269). The Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982 does not confer exclusive jurisdiction on the component jurisdictions of the United Kingd......
  • BVI Advice Necessary In Relation To BVI Company Claims: Wong v Wang
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Mondaq Virgin Islands
    • 7 Agosto 2014
    ...rejected the claimant's argument. Following existing case law in both England (Konamaneni v Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 1269) and Hong Kong (East Asia Satellite Television (Holdings) Ltd v New Cotai LLC [2011] 3 HKLRD 734) he held that the right to bring a derivati......
  • Cross-Border Derivative Issues Considered In Hong Kong, Yet Issues Remain
    • British Virgin Islands
    • Mondaq Virgin Islands
    • 13 Octubre 2014
    ...Ltd. v New Cotai LLC [2011] 3 HKLRD 734 and that of Lawrence Collins J in Konamaneni v Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd. [2002] 1 WLR 1269. The BVI common law principles relating to derivative actions on behalf of BVI companies have been replaced by Section 184C of the Act. Any memb......
4 books & journal articles
  • International Multiple Derivative Actions.
    • United States
    • Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Vol. 52 No. 1, January 2019
    • 1 Enero 2019
    ...Hoo Thomas et. al. [2008] H.K.C.F.A.R. 1498(C.F.A.). (70.) Konamaneni v. Rolls Royce Indus. Power (India) Ltd. [2001] EWHC (Ch) 470, [2002] 1 WLR 1269 (Eng. & (71.) Id. at 1272. (72.) Id. at 1282. (73.) Id. at 1284. (74.) See id. at 1283 ("The approach in these [US] cases is that the ri......
  • A comparative analysis of derivative action in Cypriot company law: Comparison with English company law and the prospect of statutory reform
    • United Kingdom
    • Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law No. 29-1, February 2022
    • 1 Febrero 2022
    ...and Liability, LSE Enterprise http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/company/docs/board/2013-study-analysis_en.pdf, p. 161.80. [2002] 1 BCLC 336.81. Hughes v. Weiss [2012] EWCH 2363 (Ch) [61], per Keyser QC.82. See also the Cypriot case Galina Weber ν. Itera Group Ltd. and ors, CY:EDLEM:2011:A......
  • Section 165(5)(b) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008: A discussion of the requirement of good faith
    • South Africa
    • Journal of Corporate Commercial Law & Practice No. , April 2021
    • 31 Marzo 2021
    ...Distribution Ltd supra note 67 at 145. 73 Konamaneni v Rolls-Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd [2004] EWHC 2071 (Ch); [2005] BCC 216 [2002] 1 WLR 1269 at 136 -139; Portfolios of Distribution Ltd supra at 30–31, 63 and 145; Re Portfolios of Distinction Ltd [2006] EWHC 782 (Ch); [2006] 2 BCL......
  • INTEGRATING PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW INTO THE AUSTRALIAN LAW CURRICULUM.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 No. 1, August 2020
    • 1 Agosto 2020
    ...on the facts of the particular case and the particular issue under consideration: Konamaneni v Rolls Royce Industrial Power (India) Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 1269, 1285-6 [52]-[55] (Lawrence Collins J), discussing Pergamon Press Ltd v Maxwell [1970] 1 WLR 1167. See also Davies et al (n 14) ch (90) A......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT