Kraiina v Tass Agency (of Moscow)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1949 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
The Shipping Corporation of India Ltd v Evdomon Corporation and Another
...Trendtex Trading Corporation Ltd v Central Bank of Nigeria [1977] 1 All ER 881 (CA) at 906e, 907h-j; Krajina v The Tax Agency [1949] 2 All ER 274 (CA) at 281D; Swiss Israel Trade Bank B v Government of Salta and Banco Provincial de Salta [1972] 1 Lloyds Rep 497 (QB) at 505; The I Congresso ......
-
HRH Prince Abdulaziz Bin Mishal Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud and Another v Apex Global Management Ltd
...saying whether or not an organisation is a department of state, is of much weight, though not decisive: see Krajina v Tass Agency [1949] 2 All E.R,274. But even this is not to my mind satisfactory. What is the test which the ambassador is to apply?" 69 Lord Denning's rhetorical question is......
-
The Royal Embassy of Saudi Arabia (Cultural Bureau) v Ms A Alhayali
...Dormoy (1832) 3 Hagg Eccl 767, In bonis Klingemann (1862) 32 LJ Prob 16, In bonis Oldenburg (1884) 9 PD 234; Krajina v Tass Agency [1949] 2 All ER 274 CA. Since Part 35 is not exclusive, I do not doubt that such certificates would still be admissible today, though not Ms Darwin also argues ......
-
Republic of Yemen v Aziz
...unlikely to be believed, a conclusion which could be reached only after having considered the evidence. In Krajina v The Tass Agency [1949] 2 All ER 274, Tucker LJ stated, at p281H, that the certificate of the Ambassador of the state claiming immunity through an organisation "is not conclus......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
One Immunity Has Gone . . . Another . . .: Holland v. Lampen‐Wolfe
...against a stateagency, immunity was granted pursuant to the principle of absolute immunity which the Englishcourts then adopted. [1949] 2 All ER 274 (CA).May 2001] Holland vLampen-WolfeßThe Modern Law Review Limited 2001 As regards this section, Lord Millett observed that ‘the words ‘‘proce......