Kremen v Agrest and Fishman

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Kremen v Agrest and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 19 January 2012
    ...have given three previous judgments in this matter on 16 April 2010, 15 October 2010 and 3 December 2010. The latter two are reported at [2011] 2 FLR 478 and [2011] 2 FLR 490. I explained that the background could be collected from the earlier judgments of HHJ Hughes QC dated 16 May 2008, o......
  • Tatiana Akhmedova v Farkhad Teimur Ogly Akhmedov
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 21 April 2021
    ...conditions for the operation of s.37 after financial relief has been granted were summarised by Mostyn J in Kremen v Agrest and Fishman [2011] 2 FLR 478 (a Part III case), as incorporated by Haddon-Cave J into his December 2016 judgment at [96], as follows: “[9] For W's application to succe......
  • Bhura v Bhura
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 18 March 2014
    ...result which the court itself considers fair?" 9 I revert to the law concerning sham transactions. I myself had to consider this in Kremen v Agrest [2010] EWHC 2571 (Fam), [2011] 2 FLR 478. At paras 12 I quoted from the convenient summary expressed by Munby J in A v A [2007] 2 FLR 467......
  • Janna Kremen (formerly Agrest) v Boris Agrest Everclear Ltd (BVI) (Intervener)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • 3 December 2010
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT