Kremen v Agrest and Fishman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 2011 |
| Court | Family Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Tatiana Akhmedova v Farkhad Teimur Ogly Akhmedov
...conditions for the operation of s.37 after financial relief has been granted were summarised by Mostyn J in Kremen v Agrest and Fishman [2011] 2 FLR 478 (a Part III case), as incorporated by Haddon-Cave J into his December 2016 judgment at [96], as follows: “[9] For W's application to succe......
-
Bhura v Bhura
...the result which the court itself considers fair?" 9 I revert to the law concerning sham transactions. I myself had to consider this in Kremen v Agrest [2010] EWHC 2571 (Fam), [2011] 2 FLR 478. At paras 12 I quoted from the convenient summary expressed by Munby J in A v A [2007] 2 FLR 467 ......
-
Janna Kremen (formerly Agrest) v Boris Agrest Everclear Ltd (BVI) (Intervener)
... ... 2 These applications are the latest instalment in the protracted and complex litigation between H, W and various third parties. The history was summarised in my most recent judgment in the proceedings between H, W and Mr Fishman [2010] EWHC 2571 (Fam) given on 15 October 2010. In those proceedings there was a comparable application by W to set aside a transaction on alternative grounds, namely under section 23 Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 and/or that the transaction was a sham ... 3 In that ... ...
-
Nichola Anne Joy v Clive Douglas Christopher Joy-Morancho and Others (Second Respondent)
...may operate: see Kemmis v Kemmis [1988] 2 FLR 223 referred to in Mostyn J's more recent and helpful formulation of the requirements in Kremen v Agrest [2010] EWHC 2571 (Fam), [2011] 2 FLR 478 at [9] to [11]. 30 I am simply not satisfied on H's evidence that on 27 November no material part ......
Request a trial to view additional results