Kruse v Johnson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1898 |
| Date | 1898 |
| Year | 1898 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
420 cases
- Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang v Syarikat Bekerjasama-sama Serbaguna Sungai Gelugor Dengan Tanggungan
- Pengarah Tanah dan Galian, Wilayah Persekutuan v Sri Lempah Enterprise Sdn Bhd
-
Mixnam's Properties Ltd v Chertsey Urban District Council
...a statutory power to Impose conditions should be approached In the same way as that of a power to make by-laws. The principles stated In Kruse v. Johnson (1898 volume 2 Queen's Bench Division, page 91) appear to me to be equally applicable. It la to be remarked that in that case the learned......
-
Smith v Western Australia
...of a by-law made by the Council. The term ‘by-law’ is not defined in either the 1934 Act or the 199Act. Lord Russell of Killowen CJ in Kruse v Johnson described a by-law as 18: ‘an ordinance affecting the public, or some portion of the public, imposed by some authority clothed with statutor......
Get Started for Free
12 books & journal articles
-
ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
...and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153; R v Dennis [1894] 2 QB 458; Bradford v Dawson [1897] 1 QB 307; Allen v Flood [1898] AC 1; Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91; R v Stoddart (1909) 2 Cr App R 217; R v Ellis [1910] 2 KB 746; R v Machardy [1911] 2 KB 1144; R v Hudson [1912] 2 KB 464; Hunt v Richardso......
-
Planting seeds for the future: Dissenting judgments and the bridge from the past to the present
...sections of the community “when we have the denite admission that they were not”.40 The crux of his reasoning was the following:4136 [1898] 2 QB 91 at 99–100. 37 See, generally, Plasket & Firman 1984: 416.38 1934 AD 167.39 It is strange that a court of four judges sat in this appeal. The r......
-
PLANTING SEEDS FOR THE FUTURE: DISSENTING JUDGMENTS AND THE BRIDGE FROM THE PAST TO THE PRESENT
...sections of the community “when we have the denite admission that they were not”.40 The crux of his reasoning was the following:4136 [1898] 2 QB 91 at 99–100. 37 See, generally, Plasket & Firman 1984: 416.38 1934 AD 167.39 It is strange that a court of four judges sat in this appeal. The r......
-
Judicial review of executive power : legality, rationality and reasonableness (2)
...sector employment, the possibility of such a functionary seeking reco urse in thecourts. Khumalo para 38.42See, eg, Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91; R v Jopp 1949 4 SA 11 (N); Zacky v Germiston43Municipality 1926 TPD 380; Osborn v Durban Corporation 1929 NPD 277; Rex v Shapiro 1935 NPD155. 3......
Get Started for Free