Kruse v Johnson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1898
Date1898
Year1898
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
414 cases
15 books & journal articles
  • ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153; R v Dennis [1894] 2 QB 458; Bradford v Dawson [1897] 1 QB 307; Allen v Flood [1898] AC 1; Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91; R v Stoddart (1909) 2 Cr App R 217; R v Ellis [1910] 2 KB 746; R v Machardy [1911] 2 KB 1144; R v Hudson [1912] 2 KB 464; Hunt v Richardso......
  • PLANTING SEEDS FOR THE FUTURE: DISSENTING JUDGMENTS AND THE BRIDGE FROM THE PAST TO THE PRESENT
    • South Africa
    • Juta Fundamina No. , January 2021
    • 17 January 2021
    ...sections of the community “when we have the denite admission that they were not”.40 The crux of his reasoning was the following:4136 [1898] 2 QB 91 at 99–100. 37 See, generally, Plasket & Firman 1984: 416.38 1934 AD 167.39 It is strange that a court of four judges sat in this appeal. The r......
  • Planting seeds for the future: Dissenting judgments and the bridge from the past to the present
    • South Africa
    • Juta Fundamina No. , January 2021
    • 17 January 2021
    ...sections of the community “when we have the denite admission that they were not”.40 The crux of his reasoning was the following:4136 [1898] 2 QB 91 at 99–100. 37 See, generally, Plasket & Firman 1984: 416.38 1934 AD 167.39 It is strange that a court of four judges sat in this appeal. The r......
  • Judicial review of executive power : legality, rationality and reasonableness (2)
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Southern African Public Law No. 30-2, January 2015
    • 1 January 2015
    ...sector employment, the possibility of such a functionary seeking reco urse in thecourts. Khumalo para 38.42See, eg, Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91; R v Jopp 1949 4 SA 11 (N); Zacky v Germiston43Municipality 1926 TPD 380; Osborn v Durban Corporation 1929 NPD 277; Rex v Shapiro 1935 NPD155. 3......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT