Kruse v Johnson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Divisional Court |
| Judgment Date | 1898 |
| Year | 1898 |
| Date | 1898 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
305 cases
- Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang v Syarikat Bekerjasama-sama Serbaguna Sungai Gelugor Dengan Tanggungan
- Pengarah Tanah dan Galian, Wilayah Persekutuan v Sri Lempah Enterprise Sdn Bhd
-
Mixnam's Properties Ltd v Chertsey Urban District Council
...a statutory power to Impose conditions should be approached In the same way as that of a power to make by-laws. The principles stated In Kruse v. Johnson (1898 volume 2 Queen's Bench Division, page 91) appear to me to be equally applicable. It la to be remarked that in that case the learned......
-
Hall & Company Ltd v Shoreham-by-Sea Urban District Council
...construed, and in this connection I would venture to follow the same approach as that of Lord Russell of Klllowen (Chief Justice) in Kruse v. Johnson (1898 volume 2 Queen's Bench Division, page 91, at page 99). This approach was echoed by some words of Lord Justice Harman in the recent case......
Get Started for Free
9 books & journal articles
-
ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
...and Railton (1884) 14 QBD 153; R v Dennis [1894] 2 QB 458; Bradford v Dawson [1897] 1 QB 307; Allen v Flood [1898] AC 1; Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91; R v Stoddart (1909) 2 Cr App R 217; R v Ellis [1910] 2 KB 746; R v Machardy [1911] 2 KB 1144; R v Hudson [1912] 2 KB 464; Hunt v Richardso......
-
PLANTING SEEDS FOR THE FUTURE: DISSENTING JUDGMENTS AND THE BRIDGE FROM THE PAST TO THE PRESENT
...sections of the community “when we have the denite admission that they were not”.40 The crux of his reasoning was the following:4136 [1898] 2 QB 91 at 99–100. 37 See, generally, Plasket & Firman 1984: 416.38 1934 AD 167.39 It is strange that a court of four judges sat in this appeal. The r......
-
Judicial review of executive power : legality, rationality and reasonableness (2)
...sector employment, the possibility of such a functionary seeking reco urse in thecourts. Khumalo para 38.42See, eg, Kruse v Johnson [1898] 2 QB 91; R v Jopp 1949 4 SA 11 (N); Zacky v Germiston43Municipality 1926 TPD 380; Osborn v Durban Corporation 1929 NPD 277; Rex v Shapiro 1935 NPD155. 3......
-
Planting seeds for the future: Dissenting judgments and the bridge from the past to the present
...sections of the community “when we have the denite admission that they were not”.40 The crux of his reasoning was the following:4136 [1898] 2 QB 91 at 99–100. 37 See, generally, Plasket & Firman 1984: 416.38 1934 AD 167.39 It is strange that a court of four judges sat in this appeal. The r......
Get Started for Free
