Kum v Wah Tat Bank Ltd (Hua Heng, Hua Li)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1971 |
| Date | 1971 |
| Year | 1971 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
JI MacWilliam Company Inc. v Mediterranean Shipping Company Sa (the Rafaela S)
..."negotiable" in the somewhat inaccurate sense in which that term is used in this context: Kum and Another v Wah Tat Bank Limited [1971] 1 Lloyd's Rep 439, 446. But if this document was a mere receipt or sea waybill there was no purpose in following the traditional practice of issuing more ......
-
Borealis AB v Stargas Ltd
...of transferring the endorser's right to the possession of the goods to the endorsee. ( Lickbarrow v Mason (1794) 5 Term Rep 683; Kum v Wah Tat Bank [1971] 1 Lloyd's 439, at pp.446–9, per Lord Devlin.) What effect this would have on the title to the goods depended on the circumstances and t......
-
J I MacWilliam Company Inc. v Mediterranean Shipping Company SA
...way, of course, the property passes when the documents are taken up." 79 This question was further discussed in the Privy Council in Kum v. Wah Tat Bank Ltd [1971] AC 439 at 446. The documents in that case were mate's receipts stated to be consigned to a named consignee and marked "non—nego......
- Vitol S.A. v Phibro Energy A.G. (Mathraki)
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Sale and Lease‐Back Agreements in a World of Title Relativity: Michael Gerson (Leasing) Ltd v Wilkinson and State Securities Ltd
...and MayervPockett’s Bristol Channel Steam Packet Co Ltd [1899] 1 QB 643; Lickbarrow vMason (1794) 5 TR683; Kum vWah Tat Bank Ltd [1971] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 439. See further, J. Ulph, ‘Conflicts of Title andThe Modern Law Review [Vol. 64486 ßThe Modern Law Review Limited However, somewhat surprisi......