Kumari v Jalal
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 25 July 1996 |
| Date | 25 July 1996 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 cases
-
Brian Thomas Taylor v John Robinson
...was expressly contemplated by Sir Thomas Bingham MR in Villiers v Villers [1994] 1 WLR 493.” 75 Having considered the decision in Kumari v Jalal [1997] 1 WLR 97 McFarlane LJ said at [37]: “In a more tangential way, I regard that too as authority for the process of repeat resort to the cou......
-
QU v QV
...the delivery of goods, the procedure to adopt is to apply for this subsequent order. 14 A similar approach was taken in Kumari v Jalal [1997] 1 WLR 97, where the Court of Appeal in England said (at Where there is a dispute about property, a court can decide the question of title and can mak......
-
Siemer v Solicitor-General
...Times Newpapers Ltd (No 2) at [51]–[76] and Dow Jones & Company Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575 at [42]–[44], [128] and [191]– [196]. 83 Kumari v Jalal [1997] 1 WLR 97 84 Contempt of Court Act 1981 (UK), s 14(1). 85 At 705. See MacMillan Bloedel Ltd v Simpson at 390 where this statement w......
-
An application by HM Solicitor General for the committal to prison of Jennifer Marie Jones for alleged contempt of court
...because there has in such a case been no further breach. When a mandatory order is not complied with there is but a single breach: Kumari v Jalal [1997] 1 WLR 97. If in such circumstances it is desired to make a further committal order — for example if the sentence for the original breach h......
Request a trial to view additional results