L v L (Ancillary Relief)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Family Division |
| Neutral Citation | [2006] EWHC 956 (Fam) |
| Date | 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
20 cases
-
Sharland v Sharland
...other procedural issues do, however, arise in the case of Gohil v Gohil [2015] UKSC 61, which was heard at the same time as this case. In L v L [2006] EWHC 956 (Fam), Munby J described this problem as "a procedural quagmire". There are three possible routes: (i) a fresh action t......
-
Alicea Helen Birch v James William Hamilton Birch
...was an application simply to vary an undertaking contained in a final order. 36 That situation was considered by Munby J (as he then was) in L v L [2008] FLR 26 in which a husband sought to set aside a consent order in its entirety and, in the alternative, sought a variation of periodical p......
-
BC v BG
...[1985] 2 WLR 47, [1985] 1 All ER 106, [1985] FLR 813. Judge v Judge[2008] EWCA Civ 1458, [2009] 2 FCR 158, [2009] 1 FLR 1287. L v L[2006] EWHC 956 (Fam), [2008] 1 FLR 26. Radmacher v Granatino[2010] UKSC 42, [2011] 1 AC 534, [2010] 3 FCR 583, [2010] 3 WLR 1367, [2011] 1 All ER 373, [2010] 2......
-
Russell Haley v Kelly Haley
...exercise of the court's inquisitorial jurisdiction, in relation to the making of consent orders, was graphically described in L v L [2006] EWHC 956 (Fam), [2008] 1 FLR 26 at [73], as being not “a rubber stamp” but that, whilst the court must always exercise a discretion, it should not be t......
Request a trial to view additional results