Laing v Laing

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Neutral Citation[2005] EWHC 3152 (Fam)
Date2005
CourtFamily Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 cases
  • Yan Wilheim Benjammin Assoun v Anais Amber Assoun [No 1]
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • March 28, 2017
    ...(f) If so, what conditions would be appropriate? 13 As respects the fifth principle, the observations of Sir Mark Potter P in Laing v Laing [2007] 2 FLR 199 at [24 – 25], with which I respectfully agree, are helpful: "[24]…I do not regard the word 'contumacious' as a useful addition or supp......
  • M v M (Financial Provision)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • October 19, 2010
    ...i.e. is it contumacious and continuing? (6) If so, what conditions would be proportionate? 22 During the course of his judgment in Laing v. Laing [2007] 2 FLR 199 Sir Mark Potter indicated that he did not find the use of the expression utilised by Ryder J. in Mubarak of "contumacious" as a ......
  • David Anthony Mann v Shelley Mann
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • December 19, 2014
    ...in similar vein to the prevention of a contemnor prosecuting his/her own application, (see Hadkinson v Hadkinson [1952] P 285; Laing v Laing [2007] 2 FLR 199) or else imposing terms which must be met before allowing participation in the defence of substantive applications as in the case of ......
  • M v M
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT