Lalchan Nanan v The State
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1986 |
| Year | 1986 |
| Date | 1986 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 cases
-
The Queen v Terry Smith
...as final. This principle was very clearly adumbrated in a decision of the Privy Council on an appeal from Trinidad and Tobago in Lalchan Nanan v The State6 in which a similar situation arose. On a charge of murder the foreman answered that the jury were unanimous on a verdict of guilty. The......
-
R. v. Connor et al., (2004) 317 N.R. 201 (HL)
...7 N.S.W.S.R. 290 (Aus.), refd to. [paras. 11, 41]. R. v. Papadopoulos, [1979] 1 N.Z.L.R. 621, refd to. [paras. 11, 102]. R. v. Nanan, [1986] A.C. 860; 79 N.R. 121 (P.C.), refd to. [paras. 12, 105, R. v. Millward, [1999] 1 Cr. App. R. 61, refd to. [paras. 12, 105, 172]. Sander v. United King......
-
S v Malindi and Others
...of Defence and Provost Marshal 1915 TPD 543; Vaise v Delaval (1785) 99 ER 944; Ellis v Deheer [1922] 2 KB 113 (CA); Nanan v The State [1986] 3 All ER 248 (PC); Boston v W S Bagshaw and Sons [1967] 2 All ER 87; R v Wooller 171 ER 589; Ras Behari Lal v The King Emperor [1933] LT 3; The D Shor......
-
S v Malinde and Others
...at 1359H; Harman v Home Office 1983 AC 280 at 303; Vaise v Delaval (1785) 99 ER 944; Ellis v Deheer [1922] 2 KB 113; Nanan v The State [1986] 3 All ER 248 (PC); Boston v W S Bagshaw & Sons [1967] 2 All F ER 87 at 88; R v Wooler 171 ER 589; Ras Behari Lal v The King Emperor [1933] All ER 723......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Subject Index
...2003 SLT 761 ........69 THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 275 INDEXESNamyslak v HMA 1995 SLT 528 .. 88 , 95Nanan v The State [1986] AC 860 .. 136Ohio v Roberts, 448 US 56 (1980) 2–27,149–164, 241, 244, 247, 256Osman v Attorney-General Transvaal1998 (4) SA 1224, CC ....................
-
The Criminal Jury in England and Scotland: The Confidentiality Principle and the Investigation of Impropriety
...not be upheld by the ECtHR if it had prevented 198 See, e.g., R v Austin (Mathew Henry) [2003] Crim LR 426 and Lalchan Nanan v The State [1986] 1 AC 860, PC. 199 For a thorough review see Darbyshire et al., above n. 1.200 N. Cameron, S. Potter and W. Young, ‘The New Zealand Jury: Towards Re......
-
The Review Roles of the Court of Appeal: Grobelaar v News International
...QB, per Field J.20 [1894] AC 284,287, per Lord Herschell LC.21 (1757) 1 Burr 383.22 [1906] AC 148 HL (3–2), 161 per Lord Loreburn LC.23 [1986] AC 860 PC; see also RvTantram (and other joined cases), The Times 20 July 2001, CA andIgwemma vChief Constable of Greater Manchester Police, The Tim......
-
Noticeboard
...having regard to the common law rule that jurors are incompetent to impugn a verdict to which they were a party (Nanan v The State [1986] AC 860) and s. 68A of the Jury Act 1977 which states: (1) A person shall not solicit information from, or harass, a juror or former juror for the purpose......