Lancashire & Yorkshire Railway Company v MacNicoll
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1918 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
19 cases
- Bryanston Leasings Ltd v Principality Finance Ltd
-
The "Cherry" and others
...As Atkin J explained in Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Company, London and North Western Railway Company, and Graeser Ltd v MacNicoll (1918) 118 LT 596 at 598 It appears to me plain that dealing with goods in a manner inconsistent with the right of the true owner amounts to a conversion, ......
-
Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company (Nos 4 & 5)
...goods", an expression which was adopted by Lord Cairns LC in his speech at p 797. 421 In Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway v MacNicholl (1919) 88 LJKB 601 Atkin J said at p 605: "It appears to me plain that dealing with goods in a manner inconsistent with the right of the true owner amounts ......
-
Club Cruise Entertainment & Travelling Services Europe v Department of Transport (The Van Gogh)
... ... plaintiff to collect the goods from the relevant railway depot. As the judge said, by that refusal, the defendant ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
THE FINE ART OF FRAUD.
...1982, in Rem, above, note 17. (21) Fact summary taken from The Government's Sentencing Memorandum, above, note 4, p. 12. (22) (1919) 88 L.J.K.B. 601 at (23) Per Lord Nicholls, in Kuwait Airways Corp. v. Iraqi Airways Co. (Nos 4 and 5) [2002] 2 A.C. 883, at para. 39. (24) Conversion applies ......
-
United Nations and African Union Conventions on Corruption and Anti-corruption Legislations in Nigeria: A Comparative Analysis
...149, HC. as an offence of corruption. The definition of ‘conversion’ by Atkin J in Lancashire Yorkshire Railway Company v MacNicol112112(1919) 88 LJKB 601, 605. as dealing with goods in a manner inconsistent with the rights of the true owner coupled with an intention to deny the owner's rig......