Lane v Hardwicke
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 13 December 1841 |
| Date | 13 December 1841 |
| Court | High Court of Chancery |
English Reports Citation: 49 E.R. 562
ROLLS COURT
[222] lane v. hardwicke. Dec. 2 13, 1841. An infant having been taken out of the jurisdiction to avoid service, the Court refused to appoint the Senior Six Clerk in Court to appear and put in his answer. Substituted service of a sulpcena to appear, ordered in the case of an infant. Mr. Hetherington moved, that the senior clerk in Court might appear, and put in an answer forthwith for the infant Defendant St. Andrew Beauchamp St. John, who was out of the jurisdiction. The affidavit in support of the motion stated, that the deponent believed, that the infant had been taken out of the jurisdiction by his parents, for the express purpose of preventing his being served with process to appear to the bill, and thereby cause delay to the Plaintiffs in the prosecution of this suit. [223] Hancock v. Eaton (2) was cited, in which an infant having been taken abroad (1) extract from decree.-The decree, after referring it to the Master to settle a conveyance from the heir at law of the testator to the new trustees, proceeded as follows :-"And it is ordered, that there be inserted therein a power for the persons so...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Johnston v Todd
...place in or about the month of December 1820." (1) See Kinder v. Forbes, 2 Beav. 503; Weymmth v. Lambert, 3 Beav. 333; Lane v. Hardwcke, 5 Beav. 222; Holhouse v. Courtney, 12 Sim. 140. BBEAV.SM. CATTELL V. SIMONS 631 Peter Marshall was directed to be Plaintiff in the issue, and the Plaintif......
-
Skegg v Simpson
...answer, all ex parte, were made in Murray v. Vipart, 1 Ph. 521; Hornby v. Holmes, 4 Hare, 306 ; Cooper v. 5 Beav. 391; Lane v. HardwicKe, 5 Beav. 222, 223. English Reports Citation: 64 E.R. 203 HIGH COURT OF CHANCERY Skegg and Simpson [454] skegg v. simpson. July 27, 1848. Upon a motion ex......
-
Lane v Hardwicke
...effect. St. Andrew St. John died in 1843, leaving an infant son, St. Andrew Beauchamp St. John, who was made a party to the suit. (See 5 Beavan, 222.) He had appeared and bad put in the common infant's answer, submitting his rights to the protection of the Court. [149] The Defendant Hardwic......