Langford Property Company Ltd v Tureman and Another
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1948 |
| Year | 1948 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Herbert v Byrne
...spending a couplo of nights there a week, and yet be protected in respect of it; see ( Langford Property Co. v. Tureman 1949 volume 1 King's Bench Division, page 29). Nor does It mean that a man has no home if he is in the course of moving from one home to another. A man on the move may hav......
-
Hampstead way Investments Ltd v Lewis-Weare
...he occupies as his home, so that, if either of them is let to him, his tenancy of it is protected by the Rent Act 1977. Langford Property Company Ltd. v. Tureman [1949] 1 K.B. 29. (2) Where a person is a tenant of two different parts of the same house under different lettings by the same l......
-
Hampstead way Investments Ltd v Courtney Lewis-Weare and Another
...can simultaneously have two homes and be protected in respect of each of them (see Langford Property Company Limited v. Tureman, 1949, 1 King's Bench, 29), it is, I think, arguably unjust that, where a man's home at the date of trial for good reason comprises two properties, in respect of ......
-
Cowan & Sons v Acton
...the house in respect of which the statutory tenancy is claimedMenzies v. MackaySC, 1938 S. C. 74; Langford Property Co. v. TuremanELR, [1949] 1 K. B. 29; Hallwood Estates v. Flack, (1950) 66 T. L. R. (Part 2) The present case must be considered in the light of these principles, and the firs......
Request a trial to view additional results