De Lassalle v Guildford
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1901 |
| Year | 1901 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
91 cases
- Tan Swee Hoe Company Ltd v Ali Hussain Bros
-
Record v Bell
...independent contract collateral to the main contract; it was not itself a contract for the sale of land, and De Lassalle v GuildfordELR ([1901] 2 KB 215, 221-222) was relied on. The terms of the two letters between the parties' solicitors in the present case were not precisely identical but......
- Tan Chong & Sons Motor Company Sdn Bhd v Alam McKnight,
-
Esso Petroleum Company Ltd v Mardon
...of Mr. Justice Wills in Best v. Edwards (1895)60 J.P., 9. Which was cited with approval by A.L. Smith, Master of the Rolls in De Lassalle v. Guildford (1901) 2 King's Bench 215 is "(was the representation) seriously intended to be the basis of the contractual relations between the parties".......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
RESOLVING AMBIGUITY THROUGH EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE
...promise in such a collateral contract must be promissory in nature or effect rather than representational: De Lassalle v Guildford[1901] 2 KB 215; [1900—3] All ER Rep 495; Wells (Merstham) v Buckland Sand and Silica Co[1965] 2 QB 170; [1964] 1 All ER 41; Esso Petroleum Co v Mardon[1976] QB ......
-
Caveat Emptor: The Position at Common Law
...2 D.L.R. 475 (Ont. C.A.), where a statement re gallonage in sale of hotel was a mere representation. See also De Lasalle v. Guildford, [1901] 2 K.B. 215 (C.A.); and Palmer v. Johnson (1884), 13 Q.B.D. 351 (C.A.). 54 The consideration for the vendor's warranty is traditionally considered to ......