Laughton v The Bishop of Sodor and Man
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
| Year | 1865 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
Horrocks v Lowe
...v. Ward [1917] A.C. 309, H.L.(E.). Clark v. Molyneux (1877) 3 Q.B.D. 237; 47 L.J.Q.B. 230, C.A. Laughton v. Bishop of Sodor and Man (1872) L.R. 4 P.C. 495, P.C. Royal Aquarium and Summer and Winter Garden Society Ltd. v. Parkinson [1892] 1 Q.B. 431, C.A. Smith v. Thomas (1835) 2 Bing.N.C. 3......
-
Watts v Times Newspapers Ltd and Others
...readers or listeners will generally have a sufficient reciprocal interest to receive the refutation by the person defamed ( Laughton v Bishop of Soder and Man [1872] LR 4 PC 495. The question whether the occasion of the publication is privileged is a question of law for the judge. Qualified......
-
Harbour Radio Pty Ltd v Trad
...in which the plaintiff has assailed him — if the attack is through the press, then again the press may be used in answer: See Laughton v Bishop of Sodor and Man40. The aggressor cannot, as Mr Odgers puts it 41, “subsequently come to the Court as plaintiff, to complain that he has had the wo......
-
Aktas v Westpac Banking Corporation Ltd
...Ltd (1896) 21 VLR 738 at 742–743 per Madden CJ, Williams and Hodges JJ with reference to Laughton v The Bishop of Sodor and Man (1872) LR 4 PC 495 at 108 Howe & McColough v Lees (1910) 11 CLR 361 at 369. 109 An approach suggested by Black J in Pyke v Hibernian Bank [1950] IR 195 at 220. 11......
Request a trial to view additional results