Law Society v KPMG Peat Marwick and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date28 October 1999
Date28 October 1999
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
15 cases
  • Moore Stephens v. Stone Rolls Ltd., (2009) 396 N.R. 203 (HL)
    • Canada
    • 30 July 2009
    ...[para. 254]. Pendleburys Ltd. v. Green (Ellis) and Co. (1936), 181 L.T. 410, refd to. [para. 257]. Law Society v. KPMG Peat Marwick, [2000] 1 All E.R. 515; [2000] 1 W.L.R. 1921 (C.A.), refd to. [para. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Ernst & Young (1992), 967 F.2d 166, refd to. [para.......
  • Re Ahmed & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 14 March 2006
    ...in solicitor, which would, otherwise, result in further claims on the Compensation Fund from the victims of that dishonesty: Law Society v KPMG Peat Marwick [2000] 1 All ER 515, affd [2000] 1 WLR 1921. A consequence of the Law Society's exercise of its two basic powers of intervention (do......
  • Law Society v Sephton & Company (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 December 2004
    ...st May 1996, at the earliest. 22 Following the decision of Sir Richard Scott, V-C in the Law Society's favour in the KPMG case ( reported at [2000] 1 All ER 515), Mr Miller renewed his invitation to Barlows to identify the issues in the present case, in a letter of 11 th November 1999. Bar......
  • Law Society v Sephton & Company (A Firm)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 10 May 2006
    ...Yet for various reasons (including the case of Law Society v KPMG Peat Marwick, decided by the Vice-Chancellor in October 1999, [2000] 1 All ER 515, and by the Court of Appeal in June 2000, [2000] 1 WLR 1921) the Law Society's claim form against Sephton was not issued until 16 May 2002 (t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Australia and Canada: The Role of Policy in Professional Liability
    • United Kingdom
    • Emerald Journal of Financial Crime No. 9-2, April 2001
    • 1 April 2001
    ...QB 653 at pp. 696-698 (CA); [1990] 2 AC 605; [1990] IAllER 568 (HZ). (10) (1976) 11 ALR 227 (HC). (11) [1979] 3 All ER 580 (ChD). (12) [2000] 1 All ER 515 (ChD). (13) [1990] 2 AC 605; [1990] 1 All ER 568; [1989] QB 653. (14) 70 DLR (4th) at p. 618. (15) Wiener, H. B. (1983) 'Common Law Liab......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT