Leahy v Attorney General (N.S.W.)
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1959 |
| Date | 1959 |
| Year | 1959 |
| Court | Privy Council |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
32 cases
- Grant's Will Trusts. Re
-
Re Recher's Will Trusts
...(ii) cannot be supported in law. Reliance for this proposition is placed principally on Leahy v. Attorney-General for New South Wales[1959] A.C. 457. Here the gift was a non-charitable purpose gift. There is no doubt the gift could not be charitable: see National Anti-Vivisection Society v.......
-
Wong, Wen-Young v (1) Grand View Private Trust Company Ltd, (2) Transglobe Private Trust Company Ltd
...law a charitable trust is by definition a trust for exclusively charitable purposes. In Leahy v Attorney General of New South Wales [1959] AC 457 at 473 (PC), where a statutory variation of this rule was under consideration, Viscount Simonds opined as follows: “ As the law stood before its ......
-
National Tourism Development Authority v Coughlan
...performance of the trust may be decreed: Maurice v. Bishop of Durham (1804) 9 Ves 399, 404; Leahy v. Attorney General of New South Wales [1959] A.C. 457, 478; Re Denley's Trust Deed [1969] 1 Ch. 373. Consequently, trusts for purposes or objects are invalid, for a purpose or object cannot su......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
Case Note
...v Attorney-General[2013] 4 SLR 491 at [18]. 80 See Petingall v Petingall(1842) 11 LJ Ch 176; Re Hooper[1932] 1 Ch 38; Mussett v Bingle(1959) AC 457. 81 Vintage Bullion DMCC v Chay Fook Yuen [2016] 4 SLR 1248 at [55]. 82 Vintage Bullion DMCC v Chay Fook Yuen [2016] 4 SLR 1248 at [56]. 83Vint......
-
The trust offshore.
...INTERNATIONAL TRUST LAWS, supra note 5, at D7.40. (116.) See 1 INTERNATIONAL TRUST LAWS, supra note 5, at B4-3. (117) See id. (118.) [1959] 2 All E.R. 300 (119.) Id. at 307. (120.) P.J. Millett Q.C., The Quistclose Trust: Who Can Enforce It?, 101 L.Q.R. 269, 282 (1985). (121.) See UNDERHILL......