Leake v Butler
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1657 |
| Date | 01 January 1657 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 124 E.R. 262
COMMON BANCK AND EXCHEQUER
[312] leake versus butler. Le case fuit debt fuit port sur arbitrement, & declare, que ou fueront divers Controversies enter eux, ils referre luy mesmes al arbitreraent de A. que arbitrate inter alia que le Defendant paier al Plaintiff 7 1. 10 a. Et sur nihil debet pleade, que le Verdiet fuit trove pur le plaintiff. Et Warde move in arrest de Judgment que cest arbitrement est voyd, intant que le agard eat tout versus le Defendant, & nest expresse pur quoy le 7 1. 10 s. est dee paie. Et donque le Plaintiff, n'ad cause de action. Henden contra. Et il agree si tout est arbitrate de un side & riens de auter, est male arbitrement; mes icy le accon eeant port sur 1'arbitrement le general declaracon est bone. Primo, L'arbitrement nest plea in barre, Car nest forsque inducement al debt, & le demand del accon est le debt, pur que nul tiel arbitreraent nest plea, pur ceo nul exception poet ee prise al arbitrement. Secundo, Ceo eat per parol, & donque le Defendant poet gager son ley. Car si ne goiet tiel arbitrement, le Defendant poet gager sou ley de nihil debet, & le exposicon al arbitrement est encounter le Verdict; Car sur 1'evidence le arbitrement doet ee UTlLBTON,31S. MICH. 5 CAB. IN COMMUNl BANCO 263 monatre. Et ti le Arbitrament aoiet voyd, ou aoiet nul arbitrement, donque le Judge voet director le Jury a trover iiihil debeb. Et le accon icy eeanb sur le Arbitrement nest necessary a monstre tout le arbitrement, mes le general allegacon eat sufficient, & issint esit le Register 111. que est auxi cite in Sir Richard Buddies Case. Richardson. Nest doubt mes in cest case arbitrement poet ee recite inter alia, & le Plaintiff poet set forth cest part del arbitrement que fist pur luy & non pluis; sur Record ne poies declarer inter alia, tie sur Indenture, come in Covenant sur Indenture ; mes eur Statute ou arbitrement, est autermt. Et issint est le Register, que est Authority super touts Authorities; Et issint per les Pregnotaries est le usual course, me* donque ceo que est recite doet ee sufficient a mainteyner le accon. Car si son matter nest sufficient sur son monstrans demesne donque n'aver Judgment. Et icy sur le declaration nest ascun reason de ceo agard, come in Bashpooles Case, ou est monstre que le argent est dee paie in satisfaction. Mes tout le matter icy est que est ore apres nihil debet plede, Eb Ver-[313]-dict sur ceo; mes jeo sue de auter opinion ove Henden...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jackson and Crisp against The Mayor of Berwick
...the covenant is alledged to have been made.- (a) It is said 2 Keb. 601, that judgment on demurrer was given for the plaintiff, And see Litt. 312. Comyn's Dig. "Arbitrament," (I. 2) and (I. 5). Kyd on Awards, page 198, and 1 Burr. Rep. 280. K. B. xv.-23* 714 HILARY TERM, 21 AND 22 CAR. 2. IN......
-
Dilley v Polhill
...for money generally, without shewing the award to be of both parts, it is well enough; but not a word said about the submission. And as to Litt. 312, that is only that the plaintiff need not set out any more of the award than makes for him; but in that case it is averred, both submitted. An......