Leakins v Clissel
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1714 |
| Date | 01 January 1714 |
| Court | Court of the King's Bench |
English Reports Citation: 82 E.R. 1022
King's Bench Division
3. leakins versus clissel. Act' pur affirming le rent des tiels meases fait taut. Action sur le case in nature dun deceipt fuit port pur ceo que (plaintiff aiant un communication concernant le emer de tiels measons) le defendant affirme que le annual rent des meases fuit taut A. que le plaintiff fidem adhibens erne les measons &c. lou in verity le annual rent des measons ne fuit tant &c. & apres verdict pur plaintiff fuit move in arrest de judgment que mil action gist in cest case sur eel communication coment soit auterment sur un garranty, Yelv. Rep. 20. Harvey & Ymmc/'s case accordant come sur lo venrlr' des biens & affirmant que sont soen action gist, quia le vendee ne poit conust le property. Et al darrain fuit tenus que action gist in cest case & que la est diversity inter affirmant que terre ou Jewell &c. vault tant car pur eel affirmation nul action gist. Et in tiel vallue nul perjury serra assigne quia tiels choses poent estre de plus vallue al un home que al auter, mes auterment est de rent ou auter choses certoino, quia le 1 SID. 147. TRIN. 15 CAR. II. B. R. 1023 vallue de ceo poet estre conus & est mestne a touts. Et pur ceo action gist pur tiel affirmation & perjury poit estre assigne in tiel vallue. Mes si le vendr' ust dit que J. S. voet aver erne les measons & voet aver done luy taut & plaintiff fidem adhibena a eel communication erne les meases coment J S. ne voet aver done tant uticore nul action gist. Et coment le declaration ne fuit fraudulenter uncore serra intend apres verdict pur plaintiff & serra ayde per...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Middleton and his Wife v Croft
...Court, tho' it arises by prescription, which* is a matter generally of a temporal conusance, viz. as an annuity. So is F. N. B. 51. 1 Sid. 146. 1 Vent. 3. In the case of Townsend and Thorpe, 13 Geo. 1, [Stran. 776, Lord Raym. 1507], the parson was indicted for sodomy, drunkenness, and a mul......
-
Cross Against Garnet
...68. S. C. Carth. 90. S. C. Comb. 142. S. C. Holt, 5. 1 Roll. Abr. 91. Moor, 126. Cro. Eliz. 44. Yelv. 20. 1 Roll. Rep. 275. Cro. Jac. 474. 1 Sid. 146. 10 Mod. 142. 12 Mod. 245. 1 Ld. Ray. 284, 408, 593, 669. 2 Ld. Ray. 1118. 1 Salk. 211, 210. 1 Com. Dig. 166, 172. 1 Stra. 414. Dougl. 656. 3......
-
Ekins against Tresham
...[102] ekins against tresham. Case for falsly affirming a messuage to be let at 421. per annum, where it was let only at 321. per arm. S. C. 1 Sid. 146. 1 Keb. 518, 522. Case, that whereas the plaintiff and defendant were in treaty for the sale of a messuage; the defendant falsly and fraudul......
-
Chandelor against Lopus
...knew it was not a bezar, or that he warranted it was a bezar.-Post. 196. 469. S. C. Dyer, 75. ia marg. S. C. 2 Roll. Rep. 5. Yelv. 20. 1 Sid. 146. 1 Stra. 653. Salk. 289. 3 Bl. Com. 159. Dougl. 158. Action upon the case. Whereas the defendant being a goldsmith, and having (a) Cro. Eliz. 164......