Lechmere v Hawkins

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1798
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Coca-Cola Financial Corporation v Finsat International Ltd and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 25 April 1996
    ...in The Judicature Act 1873. (5) The principle that a defendant could not waive his right of set off was supported by authority. In Lechmere v. Hawkins (1798) 2 Esp. 625 it was held by Lord Kenyon that a debtor could not be prevented from setting off a debt due to himself even though he had ......
  • Re Kaupthing Singer and Friedlander Ltd: Newcastle Building Society v Mill and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 8 April 2009
    ...provisions have been continued in subsequent statutes and are now enshrined in s.49(2) Supreme Court Act 1981 and CPR Rule 16.6. 11 In Lechmere v Hawkins (1798) 2 Esp.626 the defendant had promised to pay the plaintiff without regard to the debt due by the plaintiff to the defendant and “wi......
1 firm's commentaries
  • IFI Update, June 2009 - Part 2
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq United Kingdom
    • 14 July 2009
    ...in Coca-Cola Financial Corp. v. Finsat International Ltd [1998] QB 43 and notwithstanding the very old decisions in Lechmere v. Hawkins (1798) 2 Esp 626 and Taylor v. Okey (1806) 13 Ves Jun 181, Lordship held that it was possible by contract to exclude legal rights of set-off. He then went ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT