Lee-Parker v Izzet

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1971
Year1971
CourtChancery Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
33 cases
  • Nurdin & Peacock Plc (Plaintiff) v D B Ramsden and Company Ltd (Defendant (by Original Action) D B Ramsden and Company Ltd and Others (Defendant (by Counterclaim)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 17 July 1998
    ...and the approach I have been invited to adopt by both parties. Secondly, it was the approach of the court in both aspects of the Lee-Parker v Izzet litigation, at [1971] 1 WLR 1688 and [1972] 1 WLR 775. Issues 2 and 3 themselves raise sub-issues, at least some of which are of some general ......
  • British Anzani (Felixstowe) Ltd v International Marine Management (U.K.) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ...Rolimpex (The Brede) [1974] Q.B. 233; [1973] 3 W.L.R. 556; [1973] 3 All E.R. 589, C.A. Lee-Parker v. Izzet [1971] 1 W.L.R. 1688; [1971] 3 All E.R. 1099. Modern Engineering (Bristol) Ltd. v. Gilbert-Ash (Northern) Ltd. [1974] A.C. 689; [1973] 3 W.L.R. 421; [1973] 3 All E.R. 195, Mondel v. St......
  • Edlington Properties Ltd v J H Fenner and Company Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 March 2006
    ...had been spent on carrying out necessary repairs which were the landlord's responsibility under the lease, as discussed in Lee-Parker v Izzet [1971] 1 WLR 1688. The second was described by Millett LJ at 508 as being: "the ordinary equitable right of set-off which arises whenever the defenda......
  • Smith v Muscat
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 July 2003
    ...setting off damages for a previous lessor's breach of covenant. 9 In modern times it was not until the decision of Goff J in Lee-Parker v Izzett [1971] 1 WLR 1688 that it was recognised that any deduction could be made from the rent due under a lease. The decision of Goff J reasserted the a......
  • Get Started for Free