Lee v Chou Wen Hsien

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date1984
Date1984
Year1984
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 cases
  • Thio Keng Poon v Thio Syn Pyn and others and another appeal
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 8 April 2010
    ...request to resign being made to him by his co-directors and nothing else (see the Hong Kong decision of Samuel Tak Lee v Chou Wen Hsien [1984] 1 WLR 1202 (“Samuel Lee”)at [71]). Here, we are reminded of the Malaysian Court of Appeal decision in Aik Ming (M) Sdn Bhd & Ors v Chang Ching Chuen......
  • Polybuilding (S) Pte Ltd v Lim Heng Lee and Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 16 May 2001
    ...[1979] 2 MLJ 156 , Howard Smith v Ampol Petroleum [1974] AC 821[1974] 1 All ER 1126 and Lee Tak Samuel v Chou Wen Hsien [1984] HKC 409[1984] 1 WLR 1202. (2) Since all directors collectively owe their duties to the company no director or group of directors can exclude one or more directors f......
  • Teoh Peng Phe v Wan & Company
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2001
  • Teoh Peng Phe v Wan & Company
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2001
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • An analysis of directors' fiduciary duties in the removal of a director from office
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , September 2019
    • 12 September 2019
    ...cour t proclaimed, that if a shareholder votes in a manner that is adverse to the interests of the company as a whole, on that ground 3 1984 1 WLR 12024 12025 Pender v Lushing ton 1877 46 ChD 317 321; Re HR Harmer Ltd 1959 1 W LR 62 82; Sammel v Pre sident Brand Gold Minin g Co Ltd 1969 3 S......
  • RIGHTS, DUTIES AND THE VALIDATION OF IRREGULARITIES
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...request to resign being made to him by his co-directors and nothing else (see the Hong Kong decision of Samuel Tak Lee v Chou Wen Hsien[1984] 1 WLR 1202… 26 The analysis undertaken by the Court of Appeal of the notice requirement in Art 88(c) is instructive for how an ex facie procedural re......
  • ULTRA VIRES AND CORPORATE CAPACITY IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1989, December 1989
    • 1 December 1989
    ...613 per Buckley J (High Court, England; affirmed by the Court of Appeal loc.cit.at pp.615—620). 29. Samuel Tak Lee v Choti Wen Hsien[1984] 1 WLR 1202, 1206 (Privy Council on appeal from Hong Kong). 30. Mills v Mills(1937) 60 CLR 150, 185 (High Court of Australia). 31. Ernest v Nicholls(1857......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT