Leggate v HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Date | 1988 |
| Year | 1988 |
| Court | Court of Session (Inner House - Full Bench) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
DS v HM Advocate
...2 AC 557; [2004] 3 WLR 113; [2004] 3 All ER 411 Kostovski v NetherlandsHRC (1989) 12 EHRR 434 Leggate v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1988 JC 127; 1988 SLT 665; 1988 SCCR 391 Makin v Attorney-General of New South WalesELR [1894] AC 57 Millar v DicksonUNKSCUNKWLRUNK [2001] UKPC D4; 2002 SC (PC) 30; 2001 ......
-
David Peter Gallagher V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...1979 SLT (Notes) 59 Hackston v Millar (1906) 8 F (J) 52; 5 Adam 37; 43 SLR 395; 13 SLT 826 Leggate v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1988 JC 127; 1988 SLT 665; 1988 SCCR 391 McCourtney v HM AdvocateSC 1977 JC 68; 1978 SLT 10 Murdoch v TaylorELRWLRUNK [1965] AC 574; [1965] 2 WLR 425; [1965] 1 All ER 406 R ......
-
O'Neill (Charles Bernard) v HM Advocate
... ... Mr Carroll said that the fact that the trial judge was shown his client's previous convictions was not important to his argument, as it was not unusual for a judge to see the accused's previous convictions before the start of or during a trial: O'Hara v HM Advocate 1948 JC 90 ; Leggate v HM Advocate 1988 JC 127 ; 1995 Act, section 275A Lord Steyn said that the purpose (as inserted by section 10(4) of the Sexual Offences (Procedure and Evidence) (Scotland) Act 2002). But they were the trigger, as he put it, for the comments by the trial judge on his client's character. It was to ... ...
-
James Holland v HM Advocate
...v HM AdvocateUNK 2003 SLT 1119; 2003 SCCR 616 Holland v HM AdvocateUNK 2004 SLT 762; 2004 SCCR 452 Leggate v HM AdvocateSCUNK 1988 JC 127; 1988 SLT 665; 1988 SCCR 391 McLeod v HM Advocate (No 2)SCUNK 1998 JC 67; 1998 SLT 233; 1998 SCCR 77 Maan, PetrUNK 2001 SLT 408; 2001 SCCR 172 Moorov v H......
Request a trial to view additional results