Legh against Heald

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1830
Date01 January 1830
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 109 E.R. 918

IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH.

Legh against Heald

S. C. 9 L. J. K. B. O. S. 98.

legh against heald. 1830. By a lease of a tenement described as containing nineteen acres, save and except all timber trees, wood, underwoods, &c., six acres of the soil, which at the time of the lease were covered with growing wood, are not excepted, but pass to the lessee. [S, C. 9 L. J. K. B. 0. S. 98.] Trespass. The first count of the declaration stated, that the defendant, on, &c., broke and entered a certain close of the plaintiff called Eoach Key, situate, &c., trod down the grass, &e.; and then and there dug up the earth and soil, and made and sank divers quarries, pits, mines, shafts and holes in the said close of the plaintiff there, and from and out of the said quarries, pits, &e. so dug, made, and sunk as afore- 1B.&AD. 623, LEGH V, HEALD 919 said, then and there raised, got, and dug divers large quantities of rock, stone, earth and soil of the plaintiff, and carried them away and disposed thereof to his own use. Pleas not guilty, and accord and satisfaction. At the trial at the Summer Great Sessions for Chester 1829, before Jervis J., it appeared that the Woodend tenement (of which the Roach Key was part) was in the occupation of Higginbothom, a tenant of the plaintiff, under a lease for lives, by which an ancestor of the plaintiff demised the Woodend tenement, containing nineteen acres, " save and except all timber and other [623] trees, wood, underwoods, sand, marl, mines, delfs, and quarries, of what nature or kind soever, then or thereafter growing, found, or being in or upon the said premises, or any part thereof, with free liberty of ingress, egress, and regress to and for the lessor, his heirs and assigns, his and their agents, servants, and workmen, to fell, cut down, dig, sink for lead, and carry away the same at their free will and pleasure." The plaintiff then proved that the Roach Key was at the time of the demise woodland; and it appeared that, without the Roach Key, the Woodend tenement would contain thirteen acres only. Upon this evidence, the learned Judge was of opinion that the Roach Key was included in the lease, and passed to the lessee ; and that the Roach Key being in the occupation of a tenant, and not in that of the plaintiff, he must be confined, in proof, to the trespass for taking stone, &c. in the quarry, and refused to receive evidence of any trespass to the surface. In summing up, the question...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Independent Publishing Company Ltd v Attorney General of Trinidad and Tobago and another; Trinidad and Tobago News Centre Ltd and Others v Same
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 8 Junio 2004
    ... [1982] QB 762 ( Horsham Justices) 792 as a "warning". Whichever it was, Waller J expressly based it on R v Clement (1821) 4 B & Ald 218 (109 ER 918) and Scott v 27 The greatest single question raised on the present appeal is whether these cases, in particular Clement, do indeed support the......
  • Pomfret v Ricroft
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of the King's Bench
    • 1 Enero 1845
    ...been held otherwise where the words " woods and underwoods " follow the words " timber and other trees," in the same clause of exception. 1 B, & Ad. 622, Legh v. HeatdJ] (k) 14 East, 489, Queen's College v. Hallett. And it must be expressly stated in the declaration, or appear by necessary ......
  • Doe D. Rogers v C. Price and W. Price
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Common Pleas
    • 30 Noviembre 1849
    ...The only distinction I can see between [897] that case and the present is, that there the trees were not grubbed up.] In Legh v. Heald (1 B. & Ad 622), it was held, that, by a lease of a tenement, described as containing nineteen acres, save and except all timber-trees, wood, underwoods, &c......
  • Tottenham v Byrne
    • Ireland
    • Exchequer (Ireland)
    • 12 Junio 1861
    ...and FITZGERALD and DEASY, B.B. TOTTENHAM and BYRNE. Rex v. MontagueENR 4 B. & C. 598. Douglas v. Lock 2 Ad. & Ell. 743. Legh v. HealdENR 1 B. & Ad. 622. Lade v. ShepherdENR 2 Str. 1004. The Queen v. Pratt 4 Ell. & Bl. 860. Holmes v. BellinghamENR 7 C. B., N. S., 329. Harrison v. HampsonENR ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT