Lehmann v McArthur
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1865 |
| Date | 1865 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Tan Soo Leng David v Wee, Satku & Kumar Pte Ltd and Another
... ... can be made good by an amendment to the statement of claim before the trial.The learned judge relied on a line of cases commencing with Lehmann v McArthur for the legal proposition that `the lessee is not required to remonstrate with the owner over the refusal or to take upon himself the ... ...
-
Tan Soo Leng David v Wee, Satku & Kumar Pte Ltd and Another
...over the refusal or to take upon himself the expense and risk of litigation to force the owner to consent. See Lehmann v McArthur, [1868] LR 3 Ch App 496 Barrow v Isaacs & Son [1891] 1 QB 417 and Eastern Telegraph Co Ltd v Dent & Ors. [1899] 1 QB 835In Lehmann v McArthur 1 a lease contained......
-
Tan Soo Leng David v Wee Satku & Kumar Pte Ltd and Another
... ... Bickel v Courtenay Investments (Nominees) Ltd [1984] 1 WLR 795 , Lipmans Wallpaper Ltd v Mason & Hodghton, Ltd [1969] 1 Ch 20 and Lehmann v McArthur [1868] 3 AC 464 ... In Lehmann v McArthur the court considered an assignment of a lease which was `subject to the landlord`s ... ...
- Dresna Pty Ltd v Linknarf Management Services Pty Ltd (in Liquidation)
Request a trial to view additional results