Leigh v Jack

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
110 cases
  • Hayward v Chaloner
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 Junio 1967
    ...plaintiff unless they are "inconsistent with the enjoyment of the soil for the purpose for which he intended to use it", see Leigh v. Jack (1879) 5 Ex. Div. at p. 273 by Lord Justice Brett. The user of this little piece as a garden was not inconsistent with the owner's enjoyment. ......
  • Choo Eng Choon; Tan Beng Siew
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Marshall v Taylor
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • Beaulane Properties Ltd v Palmer
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 23 Marzo 2005
    ...lose the land inside the hedge for however long the mistake remained undiscovered. 87 In 1879, the Court of Appeal decided the case of Leigh v. Jack (1879) Ex. D. 264, which in effect reinstated, or came very near to reinstating, the doctrine of adverse possession which had been abolished b......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Taxonomies of Squatting: Unlawful Occupation in a New Legal Order
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review Nbr. 71-6, November 2008
    • 1 Noviembre 2008
    ...vMcFarlane (1977) 38 P&CR 452 at 472, per Slade LJ; Lambeth LBC vBlackburn (2001) 82P&CR 494 at [19] perClarke LJ.46 LeighvJack (1879) 5 Ex D 264;Wallis’sHoliday Camp vShell-Max [1975] 1 QB 94 (CA ); s ee Pow ell vMcFarlane (1977)38 P&CR 452 for criticism of this principle.Lorna......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT