Leigh v Jack
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1879 |
| Date | 1879 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
102 cases
-
Hayward v Chaloner
...out of the plaintiff unless they are "inconsistent with the enjoyment of the soil for the purpose for which he intended to use it", see Leigh v. Jack (1879) 5 Ex. Div. at p. 273 by Lord Justice Brett. The user of this little piece as a garden was not inconsistent with the owner's enjoyment.......
- Choo Eng Choon; Tan Beng Siew
-
Wallis's Cayton Bay Holiday Camp Ltd v Shell-Mex and B.P. Ltd
...purpose, like growing vegetables. Not even if this temporary or seasonal purpose continues year after year for 12 years, or more: see Light v. Jack (1879) 5 Ex. D.264; Williams Bros, v. Raftery (1958) 1 Q.B. 159; Tecbild Ltd. v. Chamberlin (1969) P. & C.R.633 The reason is notbecause the us......
-
Beaulane Properties Ltd v Palmer
...lose the land inside the hedge for however long the mistake remained undiscovered. 87 In 1879, the Court of Appeal decided the case of Leigh v. Jack (1879) Ex. D. 264, which in effect reinstated, or came very near to reinstating, the doctrine of adverse possession which had been abolished b......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Taxonomies of Squatting: Unlawful Occupation in a New Legal Order
...Powell vMcFarlane (1977) 38 P&CR 452 at 472, per Slade LJ; Lambeth LBC vBlackburn (2001) 82P&CR 494 at [19] perClarke LJ.46 LeighvJack (1879) 5 Ex D 264;Wallis’sHoliday Camp vShell-Max [1975] 1 QB 94 (CA ); s ee Pow ell vMcFarlane (1977)38 P&CR 452 for criticism of this principle.Lorna Fox ......