Lemm v Mitchell
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1912 |
| Year | 1912 |
| Date | 1912 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 cases
- Westminster City Council v Haywood (No. 2)
-
Australian Education Union v General Manager of Fair Work Australia
...statutes is particularly stringent in its application to statutes which are said to affect judicial decisions. The Privy Council in Lemm v Mitchell46 said that explicit language was required 47: ‘to justify a Court of law in holding that a legislative body intended not merely to alter the l......
- Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd
-
The Queen (on the Application of Peters Bimbola Abidoye) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department
...must clearly evince an intention by Parliament that the change should operate retrospectively and have that effect, see e.g. Lemm v Mitchell [1912] AC 400. 32 Ms Broadfoot further submitted that none of the cases relied on by the Court justified the conclusion reached in MA (Pakistan) that ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
UWAIFO V. A-G. BENDEL STATE & ORS.
...(New Series) at 316. 9. Surtees v. Ellison 9 B. & C. 750 at 752. 10.Kay v. Goodwin (1830) 6 Binbg 576 at 582. 25 11.Lemm v. Mitchell (1912) A.C. 400. 12.Rimini v. Van Praagh (1872) B L.R.Q.B. 1. 13. Barnes v. Eddleston (1876) L.R. 1 Ex. 106. 14. Postlethwaite v. Kratz (1943) 19 T.L.R. 248. ......