Lewis v Rogers
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1984 |
| Year | 1984 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
- Erewash Borough Council v Ilkeston Consumer Co-operative Society Ltd
-
Ritz Video Film Hire Ltd v Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council
...v Bell (1970) S.C.(J) 1 in which it was held that dry cleaning premises were not a shop, but it was conceded that in Lewis v Rogers (1984) 82 L.G.R. 670 this Court, without being referred to Boyd v Bell held that video hire premises were a shop. It was further conceded, and has been concede......
-
Ritz Video Film Hire Ltd v Tyneside Metropolitan Borough Council
...v Bell (1970) S.C.(J) 1 in which it was held that dry cleaning premises were not a shop, but it was conceded that in Lewis v Rogers (1984) 82 L.G.R. 670 this Court, without being referred to Boyd v Bell held that video hire premises were a shop. It was further conceded, and has been concede......
-
R v Maidstone Crown Court, ex parte Clark
...to the use of the word "include" in that definition, because as was said by Mann J (as he then was) in Lewis and Another v Rogers [1984] 82 LGR 670: 28 "A choice of 'includes' has the consequence that the meaning of a phrase or word is enlarged so as "to encompass a meaning which it would n......
Request a trial to view additional results