Libman v General Medical Council
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1972 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
103 cases
-
Preiss v General Dental Council
...on which some reliance was placed for the General Dental Council in the argument of the present appeal, is the observation in Libman v General Medical Council [1972] AC 217, 221, suggesting that findings of a professional disciplinary committee should not be disturbed unless sufficiently o......
-
Dr. Emmanuel Dibua Nwabueze v The General Medical Council
...Medical Council [1999] 1 W.L.R. 1293) and the Committee in this case had not given reasons. 62In Libman v. General Medical Council [1972] A.C. 217, 221A-B Lord Hailsham of St. Marylebone L.C. said that the only circumstances in which an appellate court can reverse a view of the facts taken......
-
R Ellen Mafico v Nursing and Midwifery Council
...out of tune with the evidence to indicate with reasonable certainty that the evidence had been misread' (per Lord Hailsham of St Marylebone LC in Libman v General Medical Council [1972] AC 217 at 221F more recently confirmed in R(Campbell) v General Medical Council [2005] 1 WLR 3488 at [23]......
-
Re Lopez Joseph Francis
...sitting in judgment on a colleague would be content to condemn on a mere balance of probabilities. In Libman v General Medical Council [1972] AC 217 the appellant, a consultant physician, was found guilty serious of professional misconduct by the Disciplinary Committee of the General Medica......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Administrative and Constitutional Law
...3 SLR 151 (‘Chia Yang Pong’) at [7]. The High Court affirmed Lord Hailsham”s observations in Libman Julius v General Medical Council[1972] AC 217 at 221 that findings of disciplinary committees should not be easily contested unless it could be shown that something was ‘clearly wrong’ on one......
-
Administrative and Constitutional Law
...indicate with reasonable certainty that the evidence had been misread’, citing Lord Hailsham in Julius Libman v General Medical Council [1972] AC 217 at 221: Huang Danmin at [57]. Disciplinary bodies with expert knowledge of the seriousness of an act were better positioned than a court to k......