Libyan Arab Foreign Bank v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1989 |
| Date | 1989 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
Walsh v National Irish Bank Ltd
...Bank v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co [1988] 2 Lloyd's Rep 494; Libyan Arab Foreign Bank v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co (No 2) [1989] 1 Lloyd's Rep 608; Lipkin Gorman v Karpnale Ltd [1991] 2 AC 548; Mackinnon v Donaldson, Lufkin and Jenrette Corpn [1986] 1 Ch 482; McCormack v Campbell [19......
-
Tidal Energy Ltd v Bank of Scotland Plc
...and that this position had been reached on day two. 32 Mr Adams' next authority was the decision of Hirst J in Libyan Arab Foreign Bank v Manufacturers Hanover Trust (No. 2) [1989] 1 Lloyds Rep 608. The facts are complicated, but for present purposes the essential features are these. In 198......
-
Walsh v National Irish Bank
...in two judgments given in the Libyan Arab Foreign Bank v Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. [1988] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 494 and (No. 2) [1989] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 608, (“The Hanover Trust case”), where, as in the Bankers Trust case, the plaintiff had accounts with two of the defendants branches, one locat......
-
Betta Ltd v Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Ltd and Hsbc Bank Plc
...is to repay at the branch of the bank where the account is kept.” 13 This principle was followed by Hurst, J. in Libyan Arab Foreign Bank v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. (2) (1989) 1 Lloyds Rep 608: “the general rule that a bank account is to be governed by the law of the place where th......
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...Libyan Arab Foreign Bank v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. (No. 2), [1989] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 608 (Comm. Ct.) ................................. 199, 368 Lilley v. Doubleday (1881), 7 Q.B.D. 510 ............................................................ 432 Lipkin Gorman v. Karpnale Ltd., [19......
-
ALL ABOUT TIME: FINALITY AND COMPLETION OF PAYMENT BY FUNDS TRANSFER
...remains risky because of the bank’s right under general banking law to combine accounts. 85 Geva, supra n 14, at pp 286—287. 86 [1989] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 608 (“Manufacturers Hanover Trust”). 87 Brindle & Cox, supra n 1, at p 133; Paget’s Law of Banking, supra n 17, at p 302. 88 This is an approa......