Lickbarrow v Mason

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1794
Year1794
CourtCourt of the King's Bench
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • MS Shipping Sdn Bhd; Sarawak Electricity Supply Corporation
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2000
  • Borealis AB v Stargas Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 22 March 2001
    ...bill of lading as capable of transferring the endorser's right to the possession of the goods to the endorsee. ( Lickbarrow v Mason (1794) 5 Term Rep 683; Kum v Wah Tat Bank [1971] 1 Lloyd's 439, at pp.446–9, per Lord Devlin.) What effect this would have on the title to the goods depended ......
  • Albazero, The (Albacruz)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 28 July 1976
    ...of the carrier did not arise in practice until the close of the eighteenth century when the bill of lading was recognised in Lickbarrow v. Mason (1794) 5 Term Rep. 683, as a document of title capable of transferring the property in the goods to which it related by endorsement and delivery. ......
  • The Future Express
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT