Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Liggett (Liverpool) Ltd v Barclays Bank

The Law Reports Cited authorities 13 Cited in 75 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1928
Year1928
CourtKing's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
54 cases
  • Crantrave Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Lloyds Bank Plc
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 13 April 2000
    ...matter". 7The judge declined to order summary judgment on the basis that the legal point raised on the authority of the Liggett (Liverpool) Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd [1928] 1 KB 48 was arguable. The judge set out the submissions of the parties fully and stated that "the bank might be able to......
  • Ibrahim v British American Bank Ltd
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 31 May 1995
    ...(3) Esso Petroleum Co. Ltd. v. Mardon, [1976] Q.B. 801; [1976] 2 All E.R. 5. (4) Liggett (B.) (Liverpool) Ltd. v. Barclays Bank Ltd., [1928] 1 K.B. 48; [1927] All E.R. Rep. 451, distinguished. (5) Royal Bank of Canada v. LVG Auctions Ltd., [1985] LRC (Comm) 95, distinguished. (6) Shapera v.......
  • Pekan Nenas Industries Sdn Bhd v Chang Ching Chuen and Others
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Malaysian Resources Corporation Bhd v Juranas Sdn Bhd
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 2002
    • Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bank and Customer Law in Canada. Second Edition
    • 19 June 2013
    ...Cusano Contracting Inc. v. Bank of Montreal, 2006 BCCA 52 ..................... 222 B. Liggett (Liverpool) Ltd. v. Barclays Bank Ltd., [1928] 1 K.B. 48 ............................................................ 250, 298–99, 303, 304 Bank and Customer Law in Canada 454 B.C. Bancorp (Re) (1......
  • Bank Accounts
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Bank and Customer Law in Canada. Second Edition
    • 19 June 2013
    ...759. 75 Twibell , above note 73; Jackson , above note 73. This is the principle in B. Liggett (Liverpool) Ltd . v. Barclays Bank Ltd ., [1928] 1 K.B. 48. 76 Re Bishop , [1965] Ch. 450; Re Cameron (1967), 62 D.L.R. (2d) 389 (N.S.S.C.); Feaver v. Feaver , [1977] 5 W.W.R. 271 (B.C.S.C.). 77 Jo......
  • UNJUST ENRICHMENT, PROPRIETARY SUBROGATION AND UNSATISFACTORY EXPLANATIONS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...Financière de la Cité v Parc (Battersea) Ltd[1999] 1 AC 221; Butler v Rice[1910] 2 Ch 277. 26B Liggett (Liverpool) Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd[1928] 1 KB 48. 27Paul v Spierway Ltd[1976] Ch 220. 28Orakpo v Manson Investments Ltd[1978] AC 95 at 104, per Lord Diplock. 29[1910] 2 Ch 277. See also G......
  • Spangaro v. Corporate Investment Australia Funds Management Ltd.: failure of consideration (failure of basis) as a claim in unjust enrichment.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 29 No. 2, August 2005
    • 1 August 2005
    ...417 (emphasis removed). (121 Bannatyne v D & C MacIver [1906] 1 KB 103, 109 (Romer LJ); B Liggett (Liverpool) Ltd v Barclays Bank Ltd [1928] 1 KB 48 (reinterpreted in Re Cleadon Trust Ltd [1939] Ch 286); Butler v Rice [1910] 2 Ch 277. All of these cases are discussed in Charles Mitchell......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT