Lilian Hazel Carr or Brown John William Holmes Appellants Against HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 1993 SCCR 382 |
| Date | 1993 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
-
Application Under The Double Jeopardy (scotland) Act 2011 By Her Majesty's Advocate Against (first) Ronnie Coulter; (second) Andrew Coulter; And (third) David Montgomery
...the jury in circumstances in which only one had been selected for trial. If the full rigour of the rationale in Brown v HM Advocate 1993 SCCR 382 were to be followed, it would not be too difficult to regard the evidence at the first trial, against only one of three possible actors, as less ......
-
Laura Stewart V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...appellant should, in such circumstances, be entitled to ask the jury to consider a verdict of culpable homicide: cf Brown v HM Advocate 1993 SCCR 382; Parr v HM Advocate 1991 SCCR 180; Broadley v HM Advocate 1991 SCCR 416. While the inability to identify which blow was fatal made it more di......
-
Green v HM Advocate
...77; 1935 SLT 532 Barrie v HM Advocate 2002 SLT 1053 Bradford v McLeod 1986 SLT 244; 1985 SCCR 379; [1986] Crim LR 690 Brown v HM Advocate 1993 SCCR 382 Campbell v HM Advocate [2019] HCJAC 58; 2020 JC 47; 2019 SLT 1127; 2019 SCCR 367 Clark v HM Advocate 2000 JC 637; 2000 SLT 1107; 2000 SCCR ......
-
Asif Rehman+adel Ishaq V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...culpable homicide to go to the jury (Parfinowski v HM Advocate [2013] HCJAC 123, Lady Dorrian at para [22], following Brown v HM Advocate 1993 SCCR 382), it might equally have been difficult to criticise him if he had not done so. In the context of the defence presented by Rehman, where he ......
Request a trial to view additional results