Lilley v Roney
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1892 |
| Date | 1892 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Lincoln v Daniels
...this court retained the decision of Watson v. McEwan to its precise facts and was not prepared to enlarge it. 32 In ( Lilley v. Roney 1892 61 L.J., 727) absolute privilege was extended to a letter of complaint against a solicitor in respect of his professional conduct forwarded to the Regis......
-
Dr Katharine White v Southampton University Hospitals Nhs Trust and Another
... ... declaration made in support or in answer." The learned editors cite in support of this passage well known cases such as Lilley vRoney (1892) 61 LJQB 727 , Lincoln v Daniels [1962] QB 237 , CA and Hung v Gardiner [2003] BCCA 257 ; 227 DLR (4 th ) 282, which was a ... ...
-
Martin v Watson
...cited. A formal complaint which initiated proceedings under the Solicitors Act Rules of 1889 was held to be absolutely privileged: see Lilley v Roney 1892 61 LJ QB 722; but a communication by a complainant sent to the Bar Council containing allegations against a barrister, with a view to th......
-
Christopher McGettigan and Mannok Holdings
...the Bar Council was not the agent of the Inn, or otherwise constitutionally responsible to determine complaints. Citing Lilley v Roney (1892) 61 LJQB 727, 8 TLR 642 the situation was different with the Law Society where a complaint about a solicitor sent to the Registrar of the Society with......
Request a trial to view additional results