Limitation (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 1987

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CitationSI 1987/1629
Year1987

1987 No. 1629 (N.I. 17)

NORTHERN IRELAND

The Limitation (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 1987

Made 15th September 1987

Coming into Operation 16th December 1987

At the Court at Balmoral, the 15th day of September 1987

Present,

The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty in Council

Whereas a draft of this Order has been approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament:

Now, therefore, Her Majesty, in exercise of the powers conferred by paragraph 1 of Schedule 1 to the1Northern Ireland Act 1974, and of all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered, as follows:—

S-1 Title and commencement

Title and commencement

1.—(1) This Order may be cited as the Limitation (Amendment) (Northern Ireland) Order 1987.

(2) This Order shall come into operation on the expiration of three months from the day on which it is made.

S-2 Interpretation

Interpretation

2.—(1) The 2Interpretation Act (Northern Ireland) 1954 applies to Article 1 and the following provisions of this Order as it applies to a Measure of the Northern Ireland Assembly.

(2) In this Order—

the 1958 Act” has the meaning given by Article 3;

“action” includes any proceeding in a court of law, an arbitration and any new claim within the meaning of section 2 of the 1958 Act.

S-3 Time limits for negligence actions in respect of latent damage not involving personal injuries

Time limits for negligence actions in respect of latent damage not involving personal injuries

3.—(1) The following sections shall be inserted in the 3Statute of Limitations (Northern Ireland) 1958 (referred to below as “the 1958 Act”) immediately after section 9D—

“Actions in respect of latent damage not involving personal injuries Special time limit for negligence actions where facts relevant to cause of action are not known at date of accrual.(9E) (1) This section applies to any action for damages for negligence, other than one to which section 9A applies, where the starting date for reckoning the period of limitation under subsection (3)(b) falls after the date on which the cause of action accrued.(2) An action to which this section applies shall not be brought after the expiration of the period applicable in accordance with subsection (3).(3) That period is either—(a) six years from the date on which the cause of action accrued; or(b) three years from the starting date as defined by subsection (4), if that period expires later than the period mentioned in paragraph (a).(4) For the purposes of this section, the starting date for reckoning the period of limitation under subsection (3)(b) is the earliest date on which the plaintiff or any person in whom the cause of action was vested before him first had both the knowledge required for bringing an action for damages in respect of the relevant damage and a right to bring such an action.(5) In subsection (4) “the knowledge required for bringing an action for damages in respect of the relevant damage” means knowledge both—(a) of the material facts about the damage in respect of which damages are claimed; and(b) of the other facts relevant to the current action mentioned in subsection (7).(6) For the purposes of subsection (5)(a), the material facts about the damage are such facts about the damage as would lead a reasonable person who had suffered such damage to consider it sufficiently serious to justify his instituting proceedings for damages against a defendant who did not dispute liability and was able to satisfy a judgment.(7) The other facts referred to in subsection (5)(b) are—(a) that the damage was attributable in whole or in part to the act or omission which is alleged to constitute negligence; and(b) the identity of the defendant; and(c) if it is alleged that the act or omission was that of a person other than the defendant, the identity of that person and the additional facts supporting the bringing of an action against the defendant.(8) Knowledge that any acts or omissions did or did not, as a matter of law, involve negligence is irrelevant for the purposes of subsection (5).(9) For the purposes of this section a person’s knowledge includes knowledge which he might reasonably have been expected to acquire—(a) from facts observable or ascertainable by him; or(b) from facts ascertainable by him with the help of appropriate expert advice which it is reasonable for him to seek; but a person shall not be taken by virtue of this subsection to have knowledge of a fact ascertainable only with the help of expert advice so long as he has taken all reasonable steps to obtain (and, where appropriate, to act on) that advice. Overriding time limit for negligence actions not involving personal injuries.(9F) (1) An action for damages for negligence, other than one to which section 9A applies, shall not be brought after the expiration of fifteen years from the date (or, if more than one, from the last of the dates) on which there occurred any act or omission—(a) which is alleged to constitute negligence; and(b) to which the damage in respect of which damages are...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT