Linbourne v Constable
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Year | 1993 |
| Date | 1993 |
| Court | Employment Appeal Tribunal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
Mr M Bramall v Flow Logistics Ltd and Others: 2300627/2021 and 2302103/2021
...that the claims against the new respondents would be time-barred (Gillick v BP Chemicals Ltd [1993] IRLR 437, Linbourne v Constable [1993] ICR 698). As Lord Coulsfield said in Gillick, questions of delay are merely matters to be considered by the tribunal in the exercise of its discretion. ......
-
Ansin vs Mango Direct Marketing Limited
...a factor in the absence of such time limits, as referred to in Gillick v BP Chemicals Limited [1993] IRLR 437 and Linbourne v Constable [1993] ICR 698, both of which related to applications to amend by adding new respondents against whom new claims would be time barred. Gillick also held th......
-
Mr A John v Cycle Specific Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) and Mr D Morris T/a Tri Specific (a sole trader):1600939/2018
...to have determined in the proceedings. 5 Case Number: 1600939/2018 20. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (“EAT”) in Linbourne v Constable [1993] I.C.R. 698 confirmed that the power to add or substitute a party can be exercised even after the final judgment in a 21. In deciding whether to exerc......