Lindsay Petroleum Company v Hurd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1874 |
| Date | 1874 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Elitestone Ltd (Appellants/Plaintiffs) Morris and Another (Respondents/Defendants) Elitestone Ltd (Respondents/Plaintiffs) Davies and Others (Appellants/Defendants)
...three of them, and counter submissions made on behalf of the defendant based upon the judgment of the Board in Lindsay Petroleum v Hurd LR 5 PC 239 delivered by Sir Barnes Peacock and cited with approval by Lord Blackburne in Erlanger v New Sombrero Phosphate Co (1877) 3 AC 1218, at 1279. T......
-
Ramkishun v Fung-Kee-Fung, Deane and Glendon
...the significance of detrimental reliance. The leading case on laches is still the Privy Council case of Lindsay Petroleum Co v. Hurd [1874] L.R. 5 PC 239–240 in which the Lord Chancellor, Lord Selborne, said: “Where it would be practically unjust to give a remedy, either because the party h......
-
The Merrow Ltd v Bank of Scotland Plc and Another
...v AL-KHUDHAIRY 1987 1 BCLC 232 1987 1 FTLR 35 LYNCH-FANNON CORPORATE INSOLVENCY & RESCUE 2ED 2012 PARA 6.39 LINDSAY PETROLEUM CO v HURD 1874 LR 5 PC 239 ARCHBOLD v SCULLY 1861 11 ER 769 1861 9 HLC 360 BANK OF BARODA v PANESSAR & ORS 1986 3 AER 751 1987 WLR 208 1986 BCLC 497 1987 CH 335 COMP......
-
Serchem Ltd v David Leslie Barnett (Respondent/Plaintiff)
...of them, and the counter submissions made on behalf of the defendant based upon the judgment of the Board in Lindsay Petroleum v. Hurd L.R. 5 P.C. 239 delivered by Sir Barnes Peacock and cited with approval by Lord Blackburne in Erlanger v. New Sombrero Phosphate Co. (1877) 3 AC 1218, 1279.......
Request a trial to view additional results