Lindsay v Cundy
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1875 |
| Date | 1875 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
Gallie v Lee
...conveyed to John in the belief that it is being assured to William". The cases cited for that proposition are the contract cases such as Cundy v. Lindsay. (1878 3 A.C. p. 459), when a mistake as to the identity of the other contracting party has been said to make the contract void ab initio......
- Citibank N.A. v Brown Shipley & Company Ltd
-
Tribune Investment Trust Inc. v Soosan Trading Company Ltd
...credible of belief: at [50].] British Motor Trade Association v Salvadori [1949] Ch 556; [1949] 1 All ER 208 (refd) Cundy v Lindsay (1878) 3 App Cas 459 (folld) Emerald Construction Co Ltd v Lowthian [1966] 1 WLR 691; [1966] 1 All ER 1013 (distd) J T Stratford & Son Ltd v Lindley [1965] AC ......
- Commonwealth Homes and Investment Company Ltd v Smith
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
Contract Law
...in question as one by correspondence. They then proceeded to hold, applying the previous decision of the House in Cundy v Lindsay(1878) 3 App Cas 459, that there had been an instance of mistaken identity. Constraints of space preclude a detailed consideration of this very important case — w......
-
VITIATING FACTORS IN CONTRACT LAW — THE INTERACTION OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
...1994) at 542. 37 The oft-cited case in the former situation is that of the House of Lords in James Cundy & T Bevington v Thomas Lindsay(1878) 3 App Cas 459. 38 See also the main text accompanying notes 21—22 and 27, supra (with regard to the doctrine of common mistake). 39 [1991] 2 All ER 6......
-
Contract Law
...“Offer and Acceptance”), however, the court, applying the principle in the leading English House of Lords decision of Cundy v Lindsay(1878) 3 App Cas 459, held that there had been no contract between the plaintiffs and the defendants and that whilst there might have been an intention on the......
-
VITIATING FACTORS IN CONTRACT LAW — SOME KEY CONCEPTS AND DEVELOPMENTS
...2 KB 243; Ingram v Little[1961] 1 QB 31; and Lewis v Averay[1972] 1 QB 198, which are, inter alia, discussed in Phang, supra n 1. 49 (1878) 3 App Cas 459. 50 And see supra n 43, at [49]. 51 Supra n 48. 52 See Phang, Lee & Koh, supra n 43. 53 See ibid at 26. 54 Ibid. 55 See its Twelfth Repor......
Request a trial to view additional results