Lingley v Firth & Sons
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1921 |
| Date | 1921 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Shotts Iron Company Ltd v Fordyce
...he had to keep resting; his foot gave him great pain and frequently gave way under him. In Lingley v. Thomas Firth & Sons, Limited (1921) 1 K.B., 655, the workwoman knew that she had been seriously injured, but concealed the fact from her employers and, as the Master of the Rolls, Lord Ster......
-
Pang Chen Suan v Commissioner for Labour
...reasonable cause under s 11(4) of the Act, viz, Prophet v Roberts (1918) 11 BWCC 301, Lingley v Thomas Firth and Sons, Limited [1921] 1 KB 655 (“Lingley”) and L A Sheridan, “Late National Insurance Claims: Cause for Delay” (1956) 19 MLR (c) Lastly, the Commissioner’s decision to accept Tan’......
-
Maddalozzo and ORS v Maddick [NTR]
...Act were, at least by some judges, regarded as a mere technicality and of slight importance: cf Lingley v Thomas Firth and Sons Ltd (1921) 1 KB 655 at 662. Rarely was an employee denied compensation under that provision. In my opinion, the draftsman of the present Act, at least so far as t......
-
Shotts Iron Company Ltd v Fordyce
...[1915] 3 K. B. 83; Hillman v. London, Brighton, and South Coast RailwayELR, [1920] 1 K. B. 284. 8 Lingley v. Thomas Firth & SonsELR, [1921] 1 K. B. 655; Aldridge v. Warwickshire Coal Co.UNK, (1925) 18 B. W. C. C. 131; Atherton v. Chorley Colliery Co.UNK, (1926) 19 B. W. C. C. 314; Soyer v. ......
Request a trial to view additional results