Littlewoods Organisation Ltd v Harris
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1977 |
| Date | 1977 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
111 cases
-
Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP v Nicholas Carmichael
...to protect its confidential information, business and goodwill by a non-compete clause — see in this regard Littlewoods v Harris [1977] 1 WLR 1472 per Lord Denning MR at 4178 F – G. It is arguable that a non-compete clause is the appropriate method for protection for the reasons given by L......
-
Ryanair DAC v Bellew
...v. The Motor Insurers' Bureau of Ireland [2017] IESC 31, (Unreported, Supreme Court, 25 May 2017). Littlewoods Organisation v. Harris [1977] 1 W.L.R. 1472; [1978] 1 All E.R. 1026. Macken v. O'Reilly [1979] I.L.R.M. 79. Marion White Ltd. v. Francis [1972] 1 W.L.R. 1423; [1972] 3 All E.R. 857......
-
NET AFFINITY Ltd v CONAGHAN
...SAXELBY 1916 1 AC 688 STENHOUSE AUSTRALIA LTD v PHILLIPS 1974 AC 391 1974 2 WLR 134 1974 1 AER 117 LITTLEWOODS ORGANISATION LTD v HARRIS 1977 1 WLR 1472 1978 1 AER 1026 CR SMITH GLAZIERS (DUNFERMLINE) LTD v GREENAN 1993 SC 161 1993 SLT 1221 1993 SCLR 231 JOHNSON & BLOY (HOLDINGS) LTD & JOHN......
-
Caterpillar Logistics Services (UK) Ltd v Paula Huesca de Crean
...including in Faccenda Chicken Ltd v. Fowler [1987] 1 Ch 117 by Neill LJ at 137H, and in Littlewoods Organisation Ltd v. Harris [1977] 1 WLR 1472 at 1479C by Lord Denning MR, and by Megaw LJ at 1485C): "If the managing director is right in thinking that there are features in the plaintiff's ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
What/whose knowledge? Restraints of trade and concepts of knowledge.
...platform for their clients' investments. (72) Miles (2009) 201 IR 1, 15-16 [24], quoting Littlewoods Organisation Ltd v Harris [1977] 1 WLR 1472, (73) Mind you, we have to go on the judgments alone. From this research we do not see the strength of the affidavits or other evidence or listen ......