Liverpool Corporation v Hope

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1938
Year1938
CourtCourt of Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
18 cases
  • China v Harrow Urban District Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Re Willment (John) (Ashford) Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 19 December 1978
    ...holder or by the person entitled to the property subject to the debenture, with having made an improper payment: see Liverpool Corporation v. Hope UNK[1938] 1 All E.R. 492. This section does not give the taxing authority a right to As I have indicated, the first question in the summons seek......
  • Practice Direction (Child: Airport Arrival)
    • United Kingdom
    • Family Division
    • Invalid date
  • Servis-Terminal LLC v Valeriy Ernestovich Drelle
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 January 2025
    ...this Act the poor rate may be made, levied, collected and recovered”, with the result, as can be seen from Liverpool Corporation v Hope [1938] 1 KB 751, at 753, that a local authority “entitled to rates” had available to it “the remedy of distress”. There was thus no question of the indivi......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • The barbados companies act, cap. 308 and receivers' duties
    • Barbados
    • Caribbean Law Review No. 6-1, June 1996
    • 1 June 1996
    ...Leicester Permanent Building Society v. Butt [1943] Ch. 308; Youvell v. Hibernia Bank Ltd.; [1918] A.C. 372, Liverpool Corpn v. Hope [1938] 1 K.B. 751; Re Kentish Homes ltd. (1993) B.C.C. 212, 220-221. as one appointed to realise a floating charge. A receiver appointed to realise a floating......