Lloyd (J.J.) Instruments Ltd v Northern Star Insurance Company Ltd (Miss Jay Jay)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1984 |
| Year | 1984 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Standard Life Assurance Ltd v Ace European Group and Others
...including, most notably, the important decision in JJ Lloyd Instruments Ltd v Northern Star Insurance Co Ltd (The Miss Jay Jay) [1985] 1 Lloyd's Rep 264 (Mustill J), [1987] 1 Lloyd's Rep 32 CA which is the modern locus classicus in this context: see Arnould para 22–18. That decision is aut......
-
Versloot Dredging BV and Another v HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG and Others
...( Wayne Tank and Pump Co Ltd v Employers Liability Assurance Corporation Limited [1974] QB 57; J J Lloyd Instruments Limited v Northern Star Insurance Co Ltd (The Miss Jay Jay) [1987] 1 Lloyd's Rep 32; The Cendor Mopu (sup.) at [22], [77], [88], 31 There are two elements to what constitut......
-
Global Process Systems Inc. and Another v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Berhad (The "Cendor MOPU")
...that burden.” 40 Miss Blanchard also relied on the following passage in the judgment of Mustill J (as he then was) in Miss Jay Jay [1985] 1 Lloyd's Rep 264 at 271. It is an extensive passage but I make no apology for citing the whole passage since it seems to me particularly instructive:- “......
-
AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier, Dr Meier & Dr Guntner Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft mbh
... ... 2 The Claimant ("AMT") is a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Insurance focus
...(1861) 1 B & S 336. Nelson Marketing International Inc v Royal and Sun Alliance Insurance Co of Canada (2006) 57 BCLR (4th) 27. [1985] 1 Lloyd's Rep 264; upheld for differing reasons by the Court of Appeal [1987] 1 Lloyd's Rep 32. As, for example, in Mountain v Whittle [1921] AC 615. Wa......
2 books & journal articles
-
Concurrency of Causes and The Cendor MOPU
...against perils of the sea based on the normal, ordinary or foreseeable conditions of the weather is thus no longer admitted. 2[1985] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 264. This part of the decision was not modified upon appeal; [1987] 1 Lloyd's Rep 32. [2011] Southampton Student Law Review Vol 1(2) Lord Mance ......
-
Comment on the Decision of the Supreme Court in The Cendor MOPU
...seas and does not include the ordinary action of the winds and waves. The Supreme Court approved the decision in The Miss Jay Jay [1985] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 264 on the interpretation given to perils of the seas and reiterated that the word ‘ordinary’ describes the action and not the ‘wind and the......