Lloyd's Bank Ltd v Cooke
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1907 |
Year | 1907 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
25 cases
- Ferrier v Stewart
-
Orbit Mining and Trading Company Ltd v Westminster Bank Ltd
...arising in this case. For this purpose the appellants relied on a decision of the Court of Appeal in ( Lloyds Bank v. Cooke 1907 1 King's Bench page 794) where Lord Collins held that the facts made out an ordinary case of Common Law estoppel, that is to say the making of a representation of......
-
Bacchus v Barrat et Al
...action elsewhere”); Bell v. Harsh [1903] 1 Ch. 528 C.A. (per Collins, M.R. at p. 540: “estoppel … is part of the law of evidence”); Lloyds Bank Ltd. v. Cooke [1907] 1 K.B. 794, C.A. (per Cozens-Hardy, L.J. at p. 804: “only a breach of the law of evidence.”) Lord Russell of Killowen said in ......
-
Thompson v Voges
...en nadeel te bewys. Sien Baxendale v Bennett (1878) 3 QBD 525 op 531. Hierdie beslissing is goedgekeur in Lloyds Bank Ltd v Cooke [1907] 1 KB 794 en Smith v Prosser [1907] 2 KB 735 op 752. Die beginsels van die Engelse gemene reg stem ooreen met dié van die Romeins-Hollandse reg en is lank ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...432 Lloyds Bank Ltd. v. Bundy, [1975] Q.B. 326 (C.A.) .................203, 205, 207–8, 216 Lloyds Bank Ltd. v. Cooke, [1907] 1 K.B. 794 (C.A.) ......................................... 295 Lloyds Bank plc v. Independent Insurance Co. Ltd., [2000] Q.B. 110 (C.A.) .................................
-
Bank Account Operation
...in the absence of express agreement to the contrary. 175 Bills of Exchange Act , above note 13, ss. 31–32; Lloyds Bank Ltd . v. Cooke , [1907] 1 K.B. 794 (C.A.); MacMillan , above note 33; Ontario Woodsworth Memorial Foundation v. Grozbord (1964), 48 D.L.R. (2d) 385 (Ont. C.A.). 176 Young v......
-
Banking Law
...the plaintiff was a holder in due course of the cheques. Ang J cited the dictum of Fletcher Moulton L J in Lloyd”s Bank, Limited v Cooke[1907] 1 KB 794 at 807—808: It is suggested, however, that these conclusions are negatived by the language of s. 29, sub-s. 1, which states the conditions ......